Iraqi Prisoner Abuse?
Much has been in the news lately about the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners of war. We have begun discussing this on other threads. Now, I think it is a big enough issue that it deserves it's own thread.
Just this morning, I heard a news report that the Red Cross had warned the "US" to address this issue a while ago. Now, just because we only recently began to hear of it doesn't mean the issue hasn't been looked at. I want to know what was done by those in authority after the Red Cross made it's concerns known. If nothing, people in high ranking positions need to be relieved of duty at a minimum.
I also see that President Bush had told Donald Rumsfeld he is not at all happy about they way he was informed of the problem...by the TV news reports! Somebody's head should roll when reports of such activities first make it to the President via new reports and not proper channels when official reports have been written about this problem prior to the reports.
International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 32%
QUOTE (tenaheff @ 6-May 04, 6:35 PM) |
Much has been in the news lately about the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners of war. We have begun discussing this on other threads. Now, I think it is a big enough issue that it deserves it's own thread. Just this morning, I heard a news report that the Red Cross had warned the "US" to address this issue a while ago. Now, just because we only recently began to hear of it doesn't mean the issue hasn't been looked at. I want to know what was done by those in authority after the Red Cross made it's concerns known. If nothing, people in high ranking positions need to be relieved of duty at a minimum. I also see that President Bush had told Donald Rumsfeld he is not at all happy about they way he was informed of the problem...by the TV news reports! Somebody's head should roll when reports of such activities first make it to the President via new reports and not proper channels when official reports have been written about this problem prior to the reports. |
As I have written elsewhere, most, if not all, Americans are just as shocked and dismayed as anyone else about this. The soldiers involved WILL be prosecuted and disciplined. Most likely, as they have broken multiple articles of military law, as well as the laws of war, they will spend the rest of their lives in Leavenworth, Kansas, making little rocks out of big ones (time at hard labor, in the military prison).
Several people in the chain of command, supervisors, commanders, and above, have already been issued with Letters of Reprimand (LoRs). That might sound rather tame, but you need to understand what it actually means.
The people who have received the LoRs will NOT receive any promotions. The LoR will remain in their records for the rest of their lives. Their careers are finished. They will not get any good assignments, they will not receive any preferential choices, they will not be able to hold any type of sensitive or important positions, and they will not be able to go where they want. They will be stuck in dead-end jobs, shuffling papers, for the rest of their careers. Depending on where they are at, they will be RIFed. For example, a Captain who is not chosen to make Major three times, will be affected by a Reduction in Force (RIF). After the third pass, they are out.
Therefore, the LoR destroys the person, without giving them a courtmartial. If there isn't sufficient evidence to support a courtmartial, this is the means of punishing them. It means that they will be forced out of the military, but won't have any civil criminal record. A courtmartial conviction equals a civil felony conviction.
I can't speak for Rumsfeld. I don't believe that he, or anyone in the Pentagon knew or condoned these actions.
Now, as I wrote on another thread, so far I haven't heard of any real torture. Humiliation, yes. What happened was extremely wrong and bad. The perpetrators must be, and will be punished. But it wasn't torture. It doesn't even approach the level of "pleasurable sexual" torture within the S/M community.
Having read quite a lot about the dark side of humanity, these people didn't suffer. Humiliation doesn't approach the level of what currently happens all over the world, including in some US prisons. When we learn about such things, we try to root them out and destroy them. But the dark side continues to find its way to express itself.
For example, consider a Turkish prison. A minor infraction, fairly recently, would merit 50 strokes of a cane on the prisoners bare feet. After a punishment, it was common for the person to be unable to walk for days or weeks.
How about an Iraqi prison 1 1/2 years ago? A Saudi prison now? A Sudanese prison? (I don't even know if Sudan HAS a prison. Christians there are just murdered and tortured in public, as are criminals.) Zimbabwe? South Africa? China? Vietnam? North Korea?
I am not participating in moral equivalency. I am pointing out that, again, for some reason, a double standard is held against the US. People express outrage against the US for the actions of a VERY few soldiers, yet disregard the official governmental positions of all these other countries. They do this KNOWING that the US is, as a whole, appalled and disgusted by the actions of these few criminals, and that they will be punished.
Take a little trip through the blogosphere. Among the military bloggers, and the conservatives, you will find universal condemnation of these acts. Since I avoid the leftist bloggers after the Fallujah incident, I don't know what they have had to say.
There are bad people everywhere. The difference is in how the culture deals with them. Ours will deal very harshly with these.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 854 85.4%
QUOTE |
I am pointing out that, again, for some reason, a double standard is held against the US. People express outrage against the US for the actions of a VERY few soldiers, yet disregard the official governmental positions of all these other countries. |
QUOTE |
I think the Pentagon, right up to the highest level, i.e. Rumsfeld, quietly condoned and approved of such practices. |
International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 32%
The atrocities committed by other countries is NOT a valid argument in defence of US treatment of Iraqi prisoners. The US marched into Iraq preaching very high moral and human values. If you are not any better then you should probably say less.
That said, I sincerely believe that the american people are extremely concerned about the behavior of these soldiers and that you as a people will get to the bottom of it ie; investigations, committees , justice etc.. But the damage has been done and only drastic actions will help the US re-establish its credibility as a just and fair nation. If I was Bush, I would order the bulldozing of the terrible reminder of the Saddam years, the Abu Ghraib prison.
QUOTE (MrB @ 6-May 04, 9:08 AM) |
The atrocities committed by other countries is NOT a valid argument in defence of US treatment of Iraqi prisoners. |
QUOTE |
If I was Bush, I would order the bulldozing of the terrible reminder of the Saddam years, the Abu Ghraib prison. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 854 85.4%
Should Bush have apologized?
ABUSE CONDEMNED: BUT BUSH STOPS SHORT OF APOLOGY
Acknowledging mistakes but stopping short of an apology, President Bush told the Arab world on Wednesday that Americans are appalled by the abuse and deaths of Iraqi prisoners at the hands of U.S. soldiers. He promised that "justice will be delivered."
https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...61200%2C00.html