Kim B
QUOTE |
God is in charge of the womb.So therefore, unless drastic measures are taken, any woman can have a child. |
QUOTE |
Look at Sarah and Rachel, or my sister, who is expecting her first after trying for 10 years. As long as a married couple is willing to accept a child if the Lord sends them one(regardless of whether He does or not) they are not misusing this gift. |
QUOTE |
Obviously He's not going to cause a gay couple to conceive, as it is physically impossible AND goes against His law |
The point I was trying to make is that while their are women who may very well never have children, through no fault of their own(like Eliza R. Snow for instance) and yet would be completely willing to accept one should the Lord send one, then they are not sinning. We could get off the subject very easily here and delve into birth control etc...but I won't go there. When I said that God is in control of the womb, that's exactly what I meant.
As far as imposing our religious views on others. How far should we allow things to go? Abortion is against my religion and I will protest it and vote against it anyway I can. I feel the same about euthanasia, and infanticide, and many other things that God would consider abominable. I am only one person and therefore cannot force anyone to conform to my views. However if I do not stand up against incorrect principles, doing everything in my power to keep good laws and get rid of bad ones, then I am in the wrong and will be held accountable to God.
Message Edited... LDS_forever: I removed your quote because it was in blank. Please make sure to check everything before posting. Thanks. |
Kim B:
QUOTE |
As far as imposing our religious views on others. How far should we allow things to go? Abortion is against my religion and I will protest it and vote against it anyway I can. I feel the same about euthanasia, and infanticide, and many other things that God would consider abominable. I am only one person and therefore cannot force anyone to conform to my views. |
QUOTE |
However if I do not stand up against incorrect principles, doing everything in my power to keep good laws and get rid of bad ones, then I am in the wrong and will be held accountable to God. |
LDS
QUOTE |
You will be held accountable for your own choices not for the choices others make. |
QUOTE |
Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the Lord, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto danger, they are gone away backward. |
QUOTE |
Great are the promises concerning this land of America. We are told unequivocally that it "is a choice land, and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall be free from bondage, and from captivity, and from all other nations under heaven, if they will but serve the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ" (Ether 2:12). This is the crux of the entire matter-obedience to the commandments of God. |
Dbackers:
QUOTE |
It is the responsibility of people to try to counsel, to persuade and to change the society to become a righteous people. If one lets others shape society, are we not in danger of the society bringing us into spiritual bondage as well as themselves. |
True.
But making Homosexual Marriage a societal norm is in fact a imposition of someone elses morals upon society as a whole and upon the righteous.
When laws are being made to institutionalize something that has never existed, then it is the right of the electorate to try to fight or support such laws, depending on their level of support of disagreement of such laws.
By suggesting that I am imposing my morals on someone else denies the fact that I or anyone else has the right to shape the legislative direction of Laws in the United States. Someone who supports legislation that would allow same sex Marriage has to right to try to impose their ideals on society. I would think that the right would extend to those who would believe the opposite.
Whenever laws are made, they invariable will impose a moral on someone else who does not agree with that law. Such is the nature of laws.
QUOTE (dbackers @ 2-Apr 08, 8:30 PM) |
But making Homosexual Marriage a societal norm is in fact a imposition of someone elses morals upon society as a whole and upon the righteous. --- Whenever laws are made, they invariable will impose a moral on someone else who does not agree with that law. Such is the nature of laws. |
Name: Peter
Comments: Yea, I'm not going to write a thesis on my view of this subject, but I would like to contribute my two cents. Too often I hear ideas tossed around that scoff at the root cause of homosexual tendencies. Make no mistake: I believe God condemns it... but don't be surprised when (in the near future) a BIOLOGICAL cause/signature is identified for homosexuality. There are plenty of examples in nature of homosexuality, and its already been shown (in flies) that several independent genetic mutations will make males chase males, and females court females. I know, I know, flies are flies, and men are the children of God. But my point is that there probably IS a biological cause, and its probably not always an active decision on the part of an unknowing person. So maybe it'd be more progressive, productive, and understanding to approach cases of homosexuality with less accusation and more assistance. Consider that they [the child of God who 'can' govern the flesh] may be struggling with the way their brain is hardwired... And that it may be no different than a straight man struggling with an above average hypothalamus or pituitary. (I.e. heterosexual sex addict) I mean, remember when we all thought there was no merit for medication when dealing with depression?