Close Topic Options

Why Create Dead Planets? - Page 2

If you look at the the moons of saturn and jupiter you find that they are all made of different chemicals or material. Sulfiric acid, carbon, water, iron, ect. Like a moving chemistry set. Something to create planets? You can also look at the rings of saturn and the planet pluto.

If the earth was going threw the space at any speed it would burn from the friction. Which would explain its return to kolob. But if it was flooded this would not only possibly protect it. It would make the flooded earth steam off. Explaining why it receded and probaly leaveing a trail of steam all the way from kolob. Perhaps the Ark wasnt an ark, but more of a submarine.

Acording to JB's graphics on earth,s doctine a season is for a thousand years. They say that venus could have ocean life. Could it be in the 4th to 6th season? will it rest on the 7th season? I think it is next in line to take the earth's place.

Planets Dead Create Why

Two comments. First, the earth is going "threw" space right now and is not "burn[ing] from the friction." Space is mostly that--empty space. Especially interstellar space.

Second, the term "season" can have multiple meanings or applications. For example, the word might apply equally well to the four seasons of the year and to a more extended view of "ages" as seasons. I strongly suggest looking at John Pratt's material in this regard.

--
Steven Montgomery

Recall the new star that announced the birth at Bethlehem? It was in its precise orbit long before it so shone. We are likewise placed in human orbits to illuminate. Divine correlation functions not only in the cosmos but on this planet, too. After all, the Book of Mormon plates were not buried in Belgium, only to have Joseph Smith born centuries later in distant Bombay. (Elder Neal A. Maxwell, Conference Report, Saturday Morning, Oct 2002)

Why Create Dead Planets? Studies Doctrine Mormon

A bad explanation on my part ( slang). I meant at high speed. And yes the earth would burn at a high speed not at the low speed we are going right now. If there isn't enough matter in space to cause this friction then there is enough on earth itself to cause it. But it would be more in the area of spinning on it's axis and not from space.

I don't understand exactly what you mean here. It is not explained in a way that I fully understand. If it is in regards to the theory that the earth was hurled into space and stopped here then the thought of it spinning on it's axis is a better explanation. And if it stayed in this solar system that would mean that this solar system would have to have been in orbit around kolob. Where is kolob? If you understand the blue shift and the red shift then you understand that in the coarse of 7 thousand years the universe would not expand to the point that we could not see kolob. At least by what we understand today. And if that was the case then at the end of the 6th day why are we still moving away from what scientist consider the center of the universe? Why aren't we moving towards it? We should have been moving towards it after 3500 years. I think I will stay with the theory that it was hurled possibly the whole solar system.

I think I will leave that to the individual's interpretation for now. I will try to get my hands on pratt's writings.

Explain

Page 2 Planets Dead Create Why

Back to the subject of dead planets:

First, as imperfect mortals, we cannot see nor comprehend spirit unless we are changed and it is revealed to us. Therefore, we have no way to know what is going on spiritually on the other planets. Their deadness is questionable.

Secondly, it is physically quite reasonable for them to be here in our solar system. God does not defy natural law; rather, he works according to higher, eternal laws we cannot now comprehend, and he would not be likely to place one planet alone twirling around an object of such great gravitational pull as the Sun. I figure the Lord believes in gravity, too.

Planets Dead Create Why

I maybe going out on a limb here but concerning the sun waisting energy lets read In the Book of Abraham Facsimile #2 Figure 5. "Is called in Egyptian Enish-go-dosh; this is one of the governing planets also, and is said by the Egyptians to be the Sun, and to borrow its light from Kolob through the medium of Kae-e-vanrash,..."

So according to this the sun has an endless supply of energy coming from Kolob itself through Kae-e-vanrash. The anti mormons don't believe it because science has not found such a thing but I believe it because it is scriptural.

Why Create Dead Planets?

A brown dwarf traveling at the speed of light is sure to destroy the planet and not move it anywhere...unless its in a million pieces.

Why Create Dead Planets - Page 2

Those are some pretty cool theories. I've never thought about any of those before! I was thinking about the "stars falling from the sky" sign, and where would the earth's destination be, but going back to Kolob makes a lot of sense.

Why Create Dead Planets Mormon Doctrine Studies - Page 2

A few years back scientists were watching the heavens and they spotted something that was totally bizarre. A rogue planet just traveling through space with no sun. This puzzled scientists how is this possible, well, forgive the pun but anything is possible with God.