Do you believe society has a need for an iconoclast? (see below). If so, then when does an iconoclast become abusive or commit mutiny?
Ref. Dictionary.com
i·con·o·clast
1. One who attacks and seeks to overthrow traditional or popular ideas or institutions.
2. One who destroys sacred religious images
I believe a healthy society needs people who are in opposition with the majority. It keeps people aware of issues that they may not readily be aware of, and is a provision for change. However, the definition of an iconoclast seems almost too disruptive as it makes them seem like they will need to use violence to make their point. While I agree there is always at least one iconoclast in each society, I am not sure if there is a need for one so long as there are oppositions who use more peaceful measures and tactics to get their point across.
International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 24.1%