That's great info, Agene, thank you! I will certainly check into that.
As far as sex education goes, I firmly believe it should be taught in the home. Obviously, not all parents agree with that idea, and do nothing to teach their kids. It's just one of the reasons this country is in the sad shape it's in, as far as TV and other popular entertainment goes. Even the so-called children's channels have lurid commercials.
Parents are negligent, in my opinion, if they do not teach their kids about intimacy -- not just the physical act of sexual relations, but the intimate nature of that physical joining, and how it relates to eternity, etc. Besides all the horrible things that can happen with sex out of wedlock, like disease and unwanted pregnancy, the spiritual problems and repentance issues are just as awful.
IMO
Roz
Yes and no. I believe it is o.k. to teach girls and boys separately, the physical changes their bodies will go through as they mature. However, as far as teaching about the sexual acts themselves and that relationship between men and women, no. That has no place in school.
Many people have strong religious convictions regarding sex. Schools will not teach about these convictions when teaching about sex. So, I believe the schools would be infringing on a family's right to practice religion.
If it is taught in schools, at least one thing must be clear. There should be no deviation from the teaching material that the teacher has been given. It is an extremely sensitive subject, and should a "not so good" person happen to have a teaching job it would ruin so much.
If the teacher is not corrupt, then by all means I support it being taught. People who're taught correctly, and remember those teachings, won't add to the degradation of society that currently exists on a worldwide basis.
QUOTE |
...However, as far as teaching about the sexual acts themselves and that relationship between men and women, no. That has no place in school. |
I agree with both of you. I want to add that I feel that the consequences (ALL of the consequences too!) of having sex should be explained to the students. I also feel that great emphasis should be placed on you DO NOT have sex unless you are married. Period, no If's, And's or But's. You are not married ~ No Sex.
I recently saw the Video: [I]Sex Has a Price Tag. [/I] by Pam Stenzel. Here is a link to her web page. https://www.pamstenzel.com/
I was greatly impressed with her video, and I highly recommend it. I recommend that the parents view it first, and then watch it with their children.
QUOTE |
I also feel that great emphasis should be placed on you DO NOT have sex unless you are married. Period, no If's, And's or But's. You are not married ~ No Sex. |
I feel *all* planned education should come from the parents or those they delegate to do so. So I do not believe anything should be taught otuside those parameters (so no state education for example).
Can "sex education" (as it is called) be delegated? I would say yes, if the parents are incapabale of it (which is hardly likely) - though I think grandparents and extended family should be resorted to before school. Put another way, I think Church more qualified as a place to learn such things than school, but even that is a distant resort to parents/extended family.
Can some aspects of "sex education" be taught by teachers? Yes, perhaps some aspects.
Let's remember millions of people have got by in the past without sex education beyond the little (or sometimes very little!) their families told them. They did not do badly considering; indeed one could say they dealt with things a lot better than our "educated" generation.
Dubhdara.
QUOTE (tenaheff @ 6-Oct 04, 6:52 AM) |
Whether or not we agree with the morality of it, teens do have sex, someone needs to help them not get infected with HIV as a result and or pregnant...in my opinion. |
QUOTE |
However, as far as teaching about the sexual acts themselves and that relationship between men and women, no. That has no place in school. |