Imagine - what if, suddenly, all of the rules in the world are abolished. Would you act different in the future, knowing what laws used to exist, but they do not hold any meaning anymore?
Also consider, what would happen to the crime rate? Would it stay the same, only the people who used to do it keeping to it? would it rise, with people who used to be innocent taking advantage of the deletion of laws? Or maybe, it would fall, criminals quitting the act because it is no longer fun (there must be some people who do it for the excitement of going against the law )?
What do you think?
International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 29 2.9%
Smudge, I moved this topic to Law and Order because it seemed to fit better here. I don't know if I would want to live in a world without laws. There would be too much confusion, because everyone would have their own perceptions of what was right and what was wrong. You ask about whether people would stop committing crimes, but, if there were no laws, what would be considered a crime anymore? In my opinion, the world would not be a big mess!
International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 24.1%
Well this could be considered a field day by the Libs, but here is my basic opinion. Laws agreed to by the populace bring peace and in many instances 'joy' to those that keep them. Without some sort of understanding that I have a right and you have a right then it would be utter chaos and we become no better than common animals fighting to maintain boundaries and things the way we want it.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
Well, a world without laws would be horrible. I don't think people are basically good. I think the opposite is true. I think if there were no laws people would take the law into their own hands...their law. So, if you offend me, why shouldn't I kill you. A bit extreme you say? Well, tell that to gang members.
You crash into my car, my brand new super expensive car, I might have to run you over or beat you up or maybe kill you, as well. Again, you think this is extreme...tell that to the average Massachusetts driver.
I think laws keep good people good. Just like locks keep honest people honest.
Edited: tenaheff on 11th Nov, 2004 - 4:07pm
International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 32%
While I agree wholeheartedly that laws are necessary, I really believe that there must be great restraint in making and enforcing those laws.
The thing to remember when discussing laws of any kind, is that the laws themselves don't generally change behaviour. What they do is outline some of the consequences associated with certain behaviour.
Consider 'natural' laws, such as those having to do with physics, chemistry, or mathematics. While it is, essentially, impossible to 'break' these laws, it is entirely possible to apply 'higher' laws to change things. As an example, while it is impossible for a person to fly (naturally), it is entirely possible with the application of advanced laws of physics, including such things as aerodynamics, thrust, etc.
I also believe that there are 'eternal' laws, which outline the consequences of our actions upon our eternal natures. But that discussion would be better taken up on the Religion board.
Now, to discuss those laws related to society, which is, I think, the original intent of this topic.
Whether we like it or not, societies always have laws associated with them. They may not be formally or explicitly outlined such as the Constitution of the United States, but they are still there. It doesn't matter how primitive or advanced the society is, it will still have both informal and formal laws of some kind. The law might be as simple and straightforward as, "If you don't like the rules, leave the group." Or, it could be as complex as those rules that American Indians used to "count coup" on an enemy. The explicit and sophisticated legal systems that have developed throughout the world are based on these primitive societal laws.
When you think about it, whenever two people associate, in any type of relationship, they establish laws of some sort. If you and I meet together for lunch, we will abide by societal laws, and establish some of our own. For example, neither of us would scream at the other in the middle of a restaurant (I would hope), as this is a violation of social custom. We might quibble, or argue in a good natured way about who picks up the check for the meal, but we would be unlikely to "stiff" the other person by leaving them with the entire cost of the meal, without reaching an agreement to do so.
So, when people note that they wouldn't want to live in a world without laws, I think that it is entirely impossible to even consider such a situation. It depends on how you define 'laws' in the discussion.
Now, one final thought. Back to my original statement. I believe that governments generally seek to establish far too many laws, and frequently establish and enforce unjust laws. Whenever they do so, no matter what government it is doing this, respect for "the law" (actually referring to the Rule of Law) is degraded. And, I believe that observation of this very tendency is what prompted this topic.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 854 85.4%
QUOTE |
I don't think people are basically good. I think the opposite is true. I think if there were no laws people would take the law into their own hands...their law |
QUOTE |
It depends on how you define 'laws' in the discussion. |
International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 29 2.9%
QUOTE |
I don't think people are basically good. I think the opposite is true. I think if there were no laws people would take the law into their own hands...their law. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
While I agree that generally, crime will increase, do you suppose there will be people who will stop criming because of no restrictions? Maybe those who commit crimes only because of the jeapordy involved?
International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 29 2.9%