Can Priesthood Blessings Be Given To Animals? (Hover)
Oooh, what a good question. I found this:
QUOTE |
I know of no official counsel from church leaders on this matter. The Church General Handbook states the following: "Brethren should administer to the sick at the request of the sick person or of someone who is vitally concerned so the blessing will be according to their faith (see D&C 24:13-14; 42:43-44, 48-52)." (Just as LDS said) Animals cannot of course exercise faith the way humans do; but there is the faith of the owner of the pet that should count for something. Marion G. Romney said: "Priesthood is power, the power of God, a vital source of eternal strength and energy delegated to men to act in all things for the well-being of mankind, both in the world and out of it (DS 3:80; Romney, p. 43)." The blessing of a pet might be considered acting "in all things for the well-being" of the owner if they are sincerely concerned and emotionally upset about it. As you said pioneers used the priesthood to bless sick oxen that they needed to survive the journey as told in the following story: (Same story posted above by LDS) I guess if it worked for their oxen it could work for any other animal that is important to a person. If you feel uncomfortable using oil, the blessing could be more in the form of a prayer, calling upon Heavenly father and invoking priesthood power; much the same way a new baby is blessed. Much of what you would do in this sort of situation would depend greatly on inspiration from the Holy Ghost. But I do not think God would be offended, and it can serve as a comfort to the owner of the pet. Website: https://www.mormonhaven.com/chad6.htm |
QUOTE |
...we do believe that all animals were created by our Father in Heaven and that they posses souls. Further we believe that animals existed as spirits, as did humans, before they came to earth. We call this period of time the pre-existence or premortal life. In Moses 3:5 it states: 'For I, the Lord God, created all things, of which I have spoken, spiritually, before they were naturally upon the face of the earth.' And in the book 'Sacred Truths of the Doctrine and Covenants' we read: The spirits of animals are in the likeness of their bodies. The spirit is eternal and does not change. The spirit of an elephant looks like an elephant; the spirit of man looks like a man. This is true of all creatures under Heaven. Therefore, the body of the creature cannot change and evolve into something different and still look like its spirit. This principle is simply stated by the Lord that there might not be misunderstandings. Sacred Truths of the Doctrine and Covenants Vol. II, p. 38 Website: https://lds.about.com/library/bl/faq/blanimals.htm |
I have given my dog a blessing before. It is true that they cannot demonstrate faith in the blessing because they have no clue what you are doing. But animals are a creation of God and if there is priesthood in the home where they live, I think they are entitled to the blessings of that Priesthood.
I agree that I can't see any reason NOT to use the Priesthood to bless animals. We have the Priesthood to minister to all of God's creatures.
Now, in Mary Smith's time, she desperately needed the oxen in order to make it to Utah. The Captain of the group had continually tried to stop her coming with them. However, she knew that she needed to be in Utah, and she exhibited incredible faith. So, despite the fact that the oxen didn't have faith, her faith was so powerful that there was probably not much in this world that could have stopped her.
Finally, was the blessing given to the oxen to their benefit, or to Mary's?
QUOTE |
Finally, was the blessing given to the oxen to their benefit, or to Mary's? |
Having grown up on dairy farms, I think more of the livestock angle rather than the pets. Having a pet die is a fact of life. It is painful, but not life threatening.
However, if your livelihood (or very life) depends on a single animal (as Mary's did), then it might be vital to have a Priesthood blessing for that animal.
I've seen blessings given to animals - 3 I think :-) The most recent blessing was given to our new baby llama born 3 wks. ago that the mother wouldn't take care of. He was quite ill & we believed he wouldn't make it through the night. He "Nephi" was given a blessing a week & a half ago and he's doing wonderful now!! I'm not so sure I believe that animals can't have faith either. Animals feelings are sometimes based on their owners feelings & if we have faith I believe that they will have faith also. I believe the animals owners who ask for the blessings to be given have to have faith. I'm also sure they need to have faith that the blessing is going to help. I've seen this in action & I do believe the statement "through faith all things are possible." ~ Debbie ~
LDS_forever you come up with great questions. Many of the brethren that have commented on verses 26-28 in Genesis say that when God gave Adam dominion over all animals that Adam was receiving Priesthood keys. If Adam was to use his Priesthood to "rule (or as President Kimball would have it preside) over" Eve (Genesis 3:16) than why should he not use the Priesthood in his "dominion" over the rest of God's creation. This would certainly foster a more pure love of the sanctity of life.