data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5978e/5978e8203440481250d7809668b0a8e1122b3a0c" alt=">"
Consider the following situations and then the question that follows:
When a scientist that does not believe in God discovers a cure for a disease, who really did it:
1. God
2. The scientist
When a scientist that believes in God develops germ warfare for his country, who really did it:
1. God
2. The scientist
When someone that does not believe in God stops to help someone in need, who really did it:
1. God
2. The person
When a scientist that does not believe in God discovers a cure for a disease, who really did it:
2. The scientist
When a scientist that believes in God develops germ warfare for his country, who really did it:
2. The scientist
When someone that does not believe in God stops to help someone in need, who really did it:
2. The person
Man is both the greatest asset and the greatest enemy of mankind. If God intervenes for good things that happens, then why not intervene for the good in everything? How would he decide what and what not to intervene in? Why not intervene when innocent people get gased? In my opinion, man was created with the ability and intelligent to create and destroy, to help and to hurt. Man does both without goading or assistance from God. God assisted by giving the means to do it, it is up to us to do the rest.
1. God and the scientist.
2. God and the scientist.
3. God and the person.
Konquererz said:
QUOTE |
God assisted by giving the means to do it, it is up to us to do the rest. |