Canadian lawmakers pass same-sex marriage bill
TORONTO (AP) - Canada's House of Commons passed landmark legislation Tuesday to legalize gay marriage, granting same-sex couples legal rights equal to those in traditional unions between a man and a woman.
Ref. https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-06...-marriage_x.htm
At the risk of the abuse I know I will take for this statement, its about time that countrys start recognizing the equality of all people. I wish our country would become more open minded and allow gay marriage also, but that argument is already being discussed elsewhere.
What is the difference between America and these other countries that allow same sex marriage? One of the countries listed above are a highly conservative country. How did a traditionally conservative country like Spain pass a law allowing this?
GAY UK COUPLES BEGIN REGISTERING FOR UNIONS
Gay couples across the United Kingdom began registering on Monday for the legal right to marry as the country moved a step closer to sanctioning gay unions this month.
Ref. https://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/200...-UK-051205.html
The government should not be involved with marriage, period.
It wasn't involved in marriage until the 1800's, when Southerners sought to prevent marriages between whites and non-whites. Before then, it was between God, the man, and the woman (and their families, of course).
Besides, a liscense implies that you need government permission. And no government is going to tell me whom I can or can't marry. That's an issue between myself and God - not myself and Uncle Sam.
QUOTE (deadhobbit) |
It wasn't involved in marriage until the 1800's, when Southerners sought to prevent marriages between whites and non-whites. Before then, it was between God, the man, and the woman (and their families, of course). |
QUOTE (deadhobbit @ 7-Dec 05, 9:31 PM) |
deadhobbitt: "Besides, a liscense implies that you need government permission. And no government is going to tell me whom I can or can't marry. That's an issue between myself and God - not myself and Uncle Sam." |
Thats an interesting comment made earlier about the usage of a license to marry. In some ways, marriage has shifted from a religious ceremony to something required to get tax benefits. Non-religious people and religious people alike must get a license to be considered married. That would be the permission spoken of earlier. So its really no longer a pact between God and Man/Woman, its a pact between two people and the government. You don't even have to get married in a church or by a preacher/priest. I was married by a judge. This sounds more like civil unions in the U.K. as opposed to the traditional view of marriage. So why do we, while excepting marriage view judge and licensing view state, disagree with civil unions as well as an alternative? And still I wonder, how did Spain, a very conservative country, vote to allow gay marriage?
QUOTE |
This reply will be a little off topic from the original topic, but I wanted to reply to a statement deadhobbitt made. Should you be allowed to marry an eleven year old girl because you want to and its between you, the girl and God? |
QUOTE |
The traditional definition has been defined as a union between a man and a woman, but where does that definition stem from. |
QUOTE |
The bible states that we should rest on Sunday. |
QUOTE |
The government should enact laws based on the general good of the people. |