Pawns
Pawns may seem to be the least of the armada on a chess board, but they are quite essential in both defense, attack and later to become a queen. What are your thoughts on the use of pawns? Do you think pawns should remain at bay while Knights, Bishops and Rooks do all the work or should they constantly be pushed forward?
When I play chess, my pawns are sacrificial. I use them to force more important pieces into bad moves. In fact, I don't hold any piece as sacred. Every piece on the board is there to sacrifice to the ends of the game. If sacrificing my queen gets me closer to checkmate, then I will sacrifice it without a second glance. When you get too attached to a particular piece, you work at protecting it instead of capturing the king. Of course, you have to protect your king though.
Pawns are one of the most used pieces for me when I play chess. As they do work very well for frontal attack as well as used for an occasional suicide with a motive. But...
QUOTE (JB) |
but in the end game if I can I am aiming for checkmate so I do not really consider them |
QUOTE (Bwren) |
A pawn can be used as a wall of sorts to prevent moves that the king can move to avoid a mate |
The pawn is used for dominating the middle board in the opening.
Also for gaining territory and putting pressure on larger pieces.
It can be very difficult to defend against a number of passed pawns in the end game, if they are defended by larger pieces such as rooks the game can be over.