No, no, this is not based on second hand information. TV6 showed where the PM admitted using a public Email address. They also regularly correspond with them (members of government) through free Email based addresses hence why I brought this up in the first place.
This is not the same as what Dr. Keith Rowley brought up, which was to say that the correspondence he gave was the SAME as the Email addresses owned by members of the government. To trace that he would need the Email headers which shows the EXIM info and IP numbers as well a the server relay information. You can't just print out something and say someone sent that unless it has the headers so it can be traced.
I am agreeing with Lydia on this one. I think the emails were faked as I have seen fake emails being drafted and sent around by people with a view to vilify a particular party. So I'm not surprised that somebody out to spite the Government would do something like this.
Why should the AG give his electronic devises over when the police is holding the security advisor to the government electronic devices more than two weeks when they originally said two days.Also why should he trust them with his stuff which contains sensitive info since everyone knows that the opposition has people in every agency/ministry leaking information to the media.Why aren't the police investigating the opposition leader or at least trying to find out who hacked into whose computers if the emails were not fake.Finally we are hearing all the time about when or if this is proven to be true what would happened to the government why aren't we hearing what would happened to the opposition leader when or if this is proven to be false or better yet deliberately falsified and brought to the parliament.