I think part of the problem is that we often confuse opinonated members with being intellectual but they are very different attributes. Certainly, being intelligent is a good thing and the more intelligence one has, the better (see Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith). However, how one uses that gift is really reflective of their spiritual maturity and their connection to the Spirit. In my opinion, the Savior (the most intelligent being who has ever lived on this planet) would never have tried to use His superior intelligence to make another feel less than wanted. His life was service-oriented and thus He used His greater light and knowledge to uplift and redeem.
I've been in the Church all my life and I've known many folks who were either considered "intellectuals" or who thought of themselves as such. It's been my experience that they tend to be members who question things in a skeptical way so as to make others feel that they are disagreeing with or are opposed to the doctrines. I've not found them to be particularly more intelligent than the ordinary members, just more skeptical. Unfortunately, their skepticism often a barrier to increasing faith, light and knowledge.
The Holy Ghost humbles me when I feel it. It makes me realize more of what I don't know than what I do. It makes me want to learn more and be better and more charitable to others. Our skeptical brothers and sisters are as much in need of the Holy Ghost as the rest of us and I'm glad they come to church so that perhaps at some point the Spirit will touch them.
QUOTE (Scott81) |
I've been in the Church all my life and I've known many folks who were either considered "intellectuals" or who thought of themselves as such. |
Elder Oaks extended interview in the PBS special about the Church talked about Intellectualism, feel free to comment:
QUOTE |
Now intellectualism is also perceived as a danger. I suppose it has been for at least a century. I read some history of some of the early confrontations with science - creation of the earth and so forth. In fact at Brigham Young University in some of its earliest years, [there] was [such a] manifestation. There"ll be other manifestations at different times. The life of the mind, which is a great, defining object of universities in our day, of which I"ve been the beneficiary in my own life, can be seen or practiced to be in flat-out opposition to the spiritual characteristics of one's faith. Revelation stands in opposition to science in some aspects according to some understandings. So I think in any day the watchmen on the tower are going to say intellectualism is a danger to the Church. And it is at extreme points, and if people leave their faith behind and follow strictly where science leads them, that can be a pretty crooked path. ([The] science of today is different than the science of yesterday.) We encourage the life of the mind. We establish and support universities that encourage education. But we say to our young people: "Keep your faith. Do the things necessary to hear the promptings of the Spirit. If you"re getting too far off the line in the latest scientific theory or whatever, you will get a spiritual warning." And I believe that. |
Thanks for the Quote LDS_forever. As I have been reading through this thread I have seen a lot of animosity. I don't think it is the intent of this thread to say that intellectualism is a bad thing, but only if an intellectual relies only on what s/he has "learned" for salvation, rather than what s/he has felt. I think there has to be a reconciliation of what is "learned" and what is "felt". That reconciliation should come in the form of promptings from the Holy Ghost as Elder Oaks implies. Obviously it is not enough to be studying, you have to ask for guidance in your studies and you have to ask the Lord for help in the application of what you have "learned".
Random House gives a good definition of Intellectual below. Pay particular attention to #4 & 8.
QUOTE |
in·tel·lec·tu·al -adjective 1. appealing to or engaging the intellect: intellectual pursuits. 2. of or pertaining to the intellect or its use: intellectual powers. 3. possessing or showing intellect or mental capacity, esp. to a high degree: an intellectual person. 4. guided or developed by or relying on the intellect rather than upon emotions or feelings; rational. 5. characterized by or suggesting a predominance of intellect: an intellectual way of speaking. -noun 6. a person of superior intellect. 7. a person who places a high value on or pursues things of interest to the intellect or the more complex forms and fields of knowledge, as aesthetic or philosophical matters, esp. on an abstract and general level. 8. an extremely rational person; a person who relies on intellect rather than on emotions or feelings. 9. a person professionally engaged in mental labor, as a writer or teacher. 10. intellectuals, Archaic. a. the mental faculties. b. things pertaining to the intellect. |
QUOTE (bobnbrittw) |
As I have been reading through this thread I have seen a lot of animosity. I don't think it is the intent of this thread to say that intellectualism is a bad thing, but only if an intellectual relies only on what s/he has "learned" for salvation, rather than what s/he has felt. |
QUOTE (JB) |
...so one can know well the Topic of let us say 'Charity', but not do home teaching or give service to the sick. Herein lies the LDS Intellectuals - all brain but no works to bring salvation to their souls. |
Bob:
QUOTE |
but for me I need to continually study and try to apply those studies to my life so that I can feel like I am growing. |
The scriptures encourage us to gain as much knowledge as we can while on this earth...but with everything theres good and bad...I've noticed the hardest people to convert to the church are intellectuals...people who are well read and knowledgable about almost everything...because of their knowledge they cannot grasp the concept of faith...they cannot believe in something that cant be seen or explained..they always have to have evidence...they do not understand that us as mortals will never in this lifetime come close to understanding the mysteries of god...that is why god is described as omnipotent...onmiscient...all knowing...I believe its the same with members...I should know because I've been through the tug of war between faith and knowledge...with knowledge comes responsibility...once we are blessed with this knowledge...we as members have the responsibility to follow through...faith without works is dead
Edited: PacLamanite on 24th Jul, 2007 - 11:58pm
Intellectualism in and of itself is not a bad thing. But like any strength that we may have, it can quickly become a weakness if not kept within the bounds the Lord has set.
Consider the words of Dallen H. Oaks
QUOTE |
Those who engage in self-congratulation over a supposed strength have lost the protection of humility and are vulnerable to Satan's using that strength to produce their downfall. In contrast, if we are humble and teachable, hearkening to the commandments of God, the counsel of his leaders, and the promptings of his Spirit, we can be guided in how to use our spiritual gifts, our accomplishments, and all of our other strengths for righteousness. And we can be guided in how to avoid Satan's efforts to use our strengths to cause our downfall |
QUOTE |
Another strength Satan can exploit is a strong desire to understand everything about every principle of the gospel. How could that possibly work to our detriment? Experience teaches that if this desire is not disciplined, it can cause some to pursue their searchings beyond the fringes of orthodoxy, seeking answers to obscure mysteries rather than seeking a firmer understanding and a better practice of the basic principles of the gospel. |