In the past few years, more and more sequals are being made, with the idea that if the first one succeeded, why not make anothe similar to it? That would be very easy! Same characters, same voices if it's a cartoon, and basically the same set. Unfortunately, most of these sequals have failed to match the first one. Why do you think it happened? Lord of The Rings, for example, or Harry Potter are good series all the way through. What made these series succeed and others fail?
Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings had sequels because their storylines required it. Most sequels that try to capitalize on successful movies are sad attempts to rehash the original storyline, or to create new plots with essentially the same sets and characters. This is a recipe for disaster. My view is - if the first movie stands on its own, don't cheapen it with a lame sequel. If the first movie requires additional films to finish the story, make the sequels completely consistent with the original. The 'Back to the Future' series was a fairly entertaining, nearly seamless example.
There are a lot of good sequals out there, and I am a big fan of the good ones. The following lists my favorite movies having sequals:
Star Wars
Blade
Lord of The Rings
James Bond Movies - are these really sequals though?
Prophecy
The Mummy
Godfather
Bourne Identity
Bad Sequals:
Exorcist
Karate Kid
Look Who's Talking
Poltergeist
Scream
I think keeping the same actors and actresses in them make a movie sequal great also keeping along the same story line, and keeping the same director...
Good sequels take you down a new road; bad sequels take you back the way you came. Like someone mentioned above there are a lot of bad sequels which simply rehash the previous plot with only cosmetic changes. Most movies do not even need sequels, especially comedies. Did anyone really wonder what happened to the Ghostbusters after the first movie? Why have a sequel to Police Academy that follows them after the academy?
O.
QUOTE (Hiestand2000 @ 22-Nov 04, 6:04 PM) |
I think keeping the same actors and actresses in them make a movie sequal great also keeping along the same story line, and keeping the same director... |
IN FICKLE FILM INDUSTRY, SEQUELS ARE CERTAIN TO SUCCEED
I blame `Aliens.` Even though `The Godfather: Part II` had proved in 1974 that a sequel could be both financially and critically successful, it was James Cameron's exhilarating 1986 monsters-meet-the-military take on Ridley Scott's elegant space nightmare `Alien` that really stirred things up.
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1,1249,...05781,00.html