I do not find this letter a reason for not hiring the Professor back, he was being honest in his opinion and I do not see any type of disrespect towards the Brethren. I agree with this in particular:
QUOTE |
As for the statement by church leaders that God has ordained marriage to be a union between a man and a woman, I find it quite troubling. It sidesteps the role of polygamy in past and future church teachings. It seems to me that if church leaders at one point in time, not very long ago, told members that the union of one man with several women was important for eternal salvation, but now leads them to believe that God only recognizes the union of one man to one woman, then some explanation is required. (I am not endorsing polygamy.) God is not the author of incoherence or injustice, but we humans often are. We in the LDS Church must be more honest about our history, including the past and future practice of polygamy in our official doctrine. This will be difficult, for it will reveal that we have been less than truthful in our public relations, and it will show our inconsistency with current statements opposing gay marriage. We can no longer afford to teach only what is useful and hope people won't discover what is true. In this day of easy Internet access, a person can find more real history of the LDS Church in 30 minutes online than the same person would in a lifetime studying approved church materials |
You cannot disagree with the Church?
BYU response to why they do not want Nielsen back
QUOTE |
In accordance with the order of the church, we do not consider it our responsibility to correct, contradict or dismiss official pronouncements of the church. Since you have chosen to contradict and oppose the church in an area of great concern to church leaders, and to do so in a public forum, we will not rehire you after the current term is over |
That is why BYU, and its supporters, is so proud that it is under condemnation from various collegiate associations. The associations condemn BYU for its lack of academic tolerance, and its habit of firing anyone who doesn't follow every pronouncement of either the Church or BYU.
But, as we all know, BYU is the "Lord's University"! (A line from The RM, a very funny movie.)
I do not support this amendment because I believe it tramples on the right of the states to govern marriage. However, I believe we need an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that protects the rights of the states to so govern (and declare that the feds CANNOT infringe on the rights of the states to legislate and protect marriage).
Mitt Romney at first announced support for the amendment as written, but recently clarified that he did NOT support it. The LDS Church is not going after Mitt for that view.
I disagree with the view that the government should not have any say on marriage. It has to. If marriage is to mean anything, the society must recognize it. It does that via legislation. So a state that did NOT recognize marriage would be harming marriage.
Rather off topic, but... Nighthawk
Which associations are these? I have no problem with BYU refusing to hire this professor. He clearly spoke out against the Church's position. Doing so violates the conditions of his hire. |
Tortdog:
QUOTE |
I have no problem with BYU refusing to hire this professor. He clearly spoke out against the Church's position. Doing so violates the conditions of his hire. |
QUOTE |
So you are saying that a professor at BYU cannot disagree with a Church position because that will cost him his job and you do not see a problem with that at all? |
Rather off topic, but... The Supreme Court addressed a similar problem with the Boy Scouts of America (the "BSA"), where a gay man tried to force the BSA to accept him as a registered scout leader. The BSA argued that it viewed his conduct in publicly announcing his homosexuality violated their freedom of association. The Supreme Court agreed, stating the BSA did not have to include a person into its organization who proclaimed things against the BSA's beliefs. |
QUOTE |
The statement also permits institutions to impose "limitations of academic freedom because of religious or other aims," so long as they are "clearly stated in writing at the time of the appointment."[11] The six regional accreditors work with American colleges and universities, including private and religious institutions, to implement this standard. Additionally, the AAUP, which is not an accrediting body, works with this same institutions. |
QUOTE (tortdog @ 28-Aug 07, 12:14 PM) |
Which associations are these? |
QUOTE |
However, I know that I regularly hear that BYU is rated as one of the most boring (least partying) schools |
QUOTE |
and as having the least amount of academic freedom. |