Good and Evil is strictly based on what society deems is not status quo(?). Takeing religion out of it wouldn't matter. People form groups and the group would deem things to be Good/Just and others to be Evil/bad. For some reason the book lord of the flies screams to be mentioned here....
Is it possible to take religion or religious aspects out of the picture when talking about Good and Evil, I don't think so.
For most people everything that is Good is a reflection of a perception of God and everything Evil is a reflection of a perception of Satan. With that line of reasoning it could be said that Hitler was evil because of how terribly wrong some of his decisions were. A religious person would look at what he did and say, "surely he must have been influenced by Satan." This does not necessarily mean that Hitler was Evil, only that he made wrong choices that could be perceived as being influenced by Evil.
I believe I have an answer to this that may be controversial (it is only a theory, one that I am not sure if I believe).
Good is that which is supported and upheld by the most powerful.
Evil is that which fights that which is powerful.
If God exists and is the most powerful then he is good and whatever he supports him is good. Satan (who is far less powerful in this scenario) is fighting God so everything that he supports is Evil.
If God does not exist, then Good is found in the most powerful entity (the strongest military, Majority, Larger society)
Evil is found in the weak, minority, those that cannot defend themselves.
Who ultimately determines Good and Evil. It is he who is in Control. Therefore I hope and have faith that There is a overriding Authority (GOD) determining what is good or what is evil, or these things are determined by flawed individuals who then impose them on others.
Edited: dbackers on 25th Jul, 2007 - 8:02pm
The aspect of Good and Evil based on a Philosophical stance is everything about what the individual or group says "good' or "evil" is and therefore cannot be deduced via an external force or religion unless said individual or group has adopted the external force's view, which in effect is the same as deciding for themselves.
QUOTE |
The aspect of Good and Evil based on a Philosophical stance is everything about what the individual or group says "good' or "evil" is |
QUOTE (Dbackers) |
So in essence are you saying that Good and Evil (as described by Philosophy) is only a construct of what the majority thinks is Good and Evil? |
I am trying to grasp good and evil in terms of the greek philosopher Heraclitus who talk extensively about LOGOS.
In the dictionary one of the definitions of LOGOS is:
QUOTE |
In pre-Socratic philosophy, the principle governing the cosmos, the source of this principle, or human reasoning about the cosmos. |
QUOTE |
Ultimately, virtue relates to the form of the Good; to truly be good and not just act with "right opinion"; one must come to know the unchanging Good in itself. |
QUOTE (Dbackers) |
I reason that philosophy has room for the idea that there is a concept of ultimate good and evil... |