The rigors of making someone a 'saint' in the Catholic Church are very high including the person to be made a saint performing miracles both before and after death. Is there someone that is not a saint, but that you think should be?
To see a list of existing Saints:
https://www.catholic.org/saints/stindex.php
Process to choose saints:
Canonization, the process the Church uses to name a saint, has only been used since the tenth century...
In 1983, Pope John Paul II made sweeping changes in the canonization procedure. The process begins after the death of a Catholic whom people regard as holy. Often, the process starts many years after death in order give perspective on the candidate. The local bishop investigates the candidate's life and writings for heroic virtue (or martyrdom) and orthodoxy of doctrine. Then a panel of theologians at the Vatican evaluates the candidate. After approval by the panel and cardinals of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, the pope proclaims the candidate "venerable."
The next step, beatification, requires evidence of one miracle (except in the case of martyrs)...
Only after one more miracle will the pope canonize the saint (this includes martyrs as well)...
Ref. https://www.catholic.org/saints/faq.php
Why is it different in the case of Martyrs? Is the idea of being murdered for the cause of christ or the church good enough in itself, at least in some cases, for someone to gain saint hood? What I don't understand is how one is not necessarily required to perform a miracle before death if they are a martyr, but it appears as if they are required after their death to perform one more miracle. What is the purpose for this?
I don't know if I could make such a statement as to who should be a Saint, because I haven't followed any historic Catholics closely enough to make that claim. Former Pope John Paul II seems to have a good chance of becoming a Saint, as defined by the Catholic church. Abcnews.com had a pretty good write-up on why and here is a link to the article. What are your thoughts on JPII becoming a Saint?
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Pope/story?id=635049&page=1
Since I have no connection at all to the Catholic church, I am probably not a good person to make such a judgement. I expect that he will seriously be considered, because of his tremendous influence on worldwide spirituality and for his incredible humility.
QUOTE |
What I don't understand is how one is not necessarily required to perform a miracle before death if they are a martyr, but it appears as if they are required after their death to perform one more miracle. What is the purpose for this? |
QUOTE |
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. Luke 9:24 |
From FoxNews.com
Pope Nixes Sainthood Waiting Period for John Paul
https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156418,00.html
QUOTE |
ROME - Pope Benedict XVI said Friday he had begun the process for the sainthood of Pope John Paul II, overriding the usual five-year waiting period following the death of a possible candidate. |
Catholic Saints
The Catholic church has specific methods for giving the title of 'Saint' to those who have departed. Are their people that you think should be Saints that are not?
BENEDICT XVI NAMES FIRST SAINTS OF HIS PAPACY
Pope Benedict XVI presided over the first canonization ceremony of his papacy on Sunday, proclaiming five new saints.
Ref. Source
Catholic Saints (Hover)
I have a different concept of sainthood, but I am surprised about some names that have taken long to get in there. I also wonder about the consistency in standards for making someone a saint, is it just based on the view of the Pope of the time?