I have long pondered starting a thread like this, one that touches on personal opinion more than a specific doctrine per se, but yes, it will have to be doctrinal in order to remain under this board, so here goes...
Most times when you walk through an average block meeting you may or may not notice various levels of spirituality. This will all depend on your reason for being in Church and how you view the importance of renewing your covenants. Let us take the minutes before Sacrament meeting as an example. You may find one or two people sitting quietly in reflective thought or reading the scriptures, they are earnestly trying to prepare to partake of the flesh and blood. Then you will see the majority of others... looking at the latest dress, meeting friends, talking about what they did last week etc. As the person conducting gets up then there is a sudden hussel to be quiet, although there are a few that just can't help but to continue talking by notes or whisper. Sad enough they 'whisper' so loudly that you can hear what they are saying. The meeting is over, those that seem more popular (because of look, wealth or position) seem to attract a social cliche, those that are in need, not so charismatic or comely are left alone. Sometimes these 'loners' have within them a testimony so bright and a witness so strong that it will surprise even the most eloquent of scriptorians. The Lord showed one of the examples of faithfulness with the woman and the two mites... only the Lord noticed her contribution, no body else could be bothered. I am sure if someone came a long and placed a bag of silver in the temple then he/she would receive praise and 'worship'.
One of the things I like to do sometimes is observe people, especially their reaction to certain events... there is such a difference in the way that members perceive things based on the outward position rather than the inward. Knowing someone's spirit requires discernment and desire, which of course is harder than making an assessment from a glance. Here is a simple example... if I was called as Stake President I would instantly receive enemies and friends just because of my new call. The only thing that changes that is what I choose to do in my role, but for some, no matter what you do they will only see you one way, because their measure of a man is based on their own perception and not the Gospel. Members generally seem to attach themselves if you will to those who seem to 'know what they are about in life materially or intellectually'. I have seen this time and time again, but they miss the point. The Gospel really is about being the best servant you can, the most admired should be the one who seeks to serve the best - the servant of all. Callings do not get anyone into Exaltation... if you are the usher or the GA you will have every right to return to God if you serve in the capacity to which you are called. I have found that genuine service and caring for Brothers and Sisters takes away all interest in the outward appearance and a renewed interest in people's spirit, feelings and situation come to the forefront.
Then there are some who focus on minute or at least to me... it seems minute pieces of information such as 'should we drink Coke?' and they have never done any of their visiting or home teaching. This to me does not make much sense. There are those, and they are rare, that do all they can, and do it so well, that they can afford to 'perfect' their lives if you can call it perfecting their life by not drinking coke, etc.
What are your thoughts?
You understand exactly what I meant and I am glad you indicated the points about age and language. Another point of worthiness is thinking that certain Priesthood holders somehow have a more powerful priesthood power than others. Yes it seems comical but think about it. Most members seek after the Bishop rather than their home teachers or family members for blessings. Members think that missionaries are somehow more holy than 'regular' members... I do not understand how they come to these conclusions... Possibly it has something to do with the natural man. Fathers and husbands are ignored as Patriarchs because the Stake President seems more 'worthy' when in fact the Father is the Patriarch of the home and presides.
Joseph Smith said...
Just my $.02 worth here. It's also very interesting when you can see interconnections between high-level callings. Okay, so maybe every member of this one family *are* very spiritual, but are there not many other church members with that same spirituality? Or perhaps who need to be pushed to grow within the gospel?
I've seen circles within circles of inter-relationships in very high callings, and I have to wonder if every one of those is not for convenience or lack of personal knowledge of someone else who is eligible, and not necessarily because that person might be the best for the job. I understand when there are thousands of members in an area it's difficult to get to know them all -- but in my naivete I would hope the leaders would fast and pray for the Spirit to guide them to the best candidate for very responsible positions, and not just rely on who their closest personal friends and family members are.
Please don't get me wrong, I'm not resentful of these people in these positions, for every one of them I have known seem to be doing the job for which they were called. I'm just curious at the obvious connections, it's like a "social clique."
I suppose it would take a very different level of spirituality for a leader to rely solely on the Spirit.
In my opinion, of course.
Roz
QUOTE |
Often the fact that they are called is an indication of how spiritual they are, |
QUOTE |
I've seen circles within circles of inter-relationships in very high callings, and I have to wonder if every one of those is not for convenience or lack of personal knowledge of someone else who is eligible, and not necessarily because that person might be the best for the job. I understand when there are thousands of members in an area it's difficult to get to know them all -- but in my naivete I would hope the leaders would fast and pray for the Spirit to guide them to the best candidate for very responsible positions, and not just rely on who their closest personal friends and family members are. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not resentful of these people in these positions, for every one of them I have known seem to be doing the job for which they were called. I'm just curious at the obvious connections, it's like a "social clique." |
Farseer, you touched on another aspect of what I am saying. Yes, I think North Americans have a term for this... 'groupies'? Leaders need to give the 'unknown' or 'young' member a chance and not keep calling the same people over and over as though they are the only ones able. Another factor here is outside relationships that are brought into what should be inspired callings. An example of this... I am called as President of 'x' and I need to choose counselors... instead of prayerfully considering all the possibilities I choose my closest friends or even business associates so I have a better relationship with them or because I have a preconceived notion that things will somehow 'run better' with those that I already have an external (outside of the Church) connection.
I think you started this topic in response to some things I wrote elsewhere.
I agree with all that all of you have said so far. There certainly are different levels of spirituality exhibited within wards and stakes, and many times what is exhibited is far different from reality.
Now, when I have written about levels of spirituality, including my little list of 7 levels that Bro. Yorgason wrote about in his book, I am trying to talk about reality, not perception. I am trying to consider myselft - where I fall within that list. And that really isn't so difficult, but it is sobering.
JB, when you wrote about a person with "C-level" accomplishments entering into the Celestial Kingdom, you were completely right. It isn't so much the accomplishment, but the effort and how the person addresses life that matters.
What I was trying to get to was the idea that our Father has promised specific things to us. The Saints in the Kirtland era experienced those things, including, but not limited to, the gifts of tongues and interpretation, raising the dead, seeing angels in everyday life, seeing the Lord, speaking with the Lord, healing the sick, and conversing with angels. This is what the Lord wants us to experience on a daily basis.
But most of us stop at simple activity within the Church. We serve as teachers, nursery workers, quorum leaders, even Bishops or Branch Presidents. This consumes our time and efforts.
But to advance to the next level requires real effort and application. We may not actually appear to others to change in any way as we advance to become Sons and Daughters of Jesus Christ, but we will most certainly change. According to both Brothers Yorgason, as we advance to the "highest" level of spirituality, we may appear to others to be eccentric or unstable, because we follow the Spirit in all things, so our ways are closer to God's ways, rather than man's.
Remember that the purpose of the Church, and its leaders, is not to bring people to the Church (which is actually where most of us stop), but to bring us to Christ. We can't follow the Church, the Prophet, or the Apostles into the Celestial Kingdom. We can follow their lead to Christ, then we must personally follow Him into our exaltation.
I will end with a rather long quote from the book:
QUOTE |
A legitimate question might be, "Am I being bad or wicked if I don't want to push ahead with being more spiritual? After all, many good people have lived and died without seeing angels or having superlative spiritual experiences. In fact, numerous good Latter-day Saints have probably passed through mortality without ever fully being born again. Is that such a bad thing?" The answer would be, "It depends on who we want to be." President Ezra Taft Benson states: "In the usual sense of the term, Church membership means that a person has his or her name officially recorded on the membership records of the Church. By that definition, we have more than [eight] million members of the Church. "But the Lord defines a member of His Kingdom in quite a different way. In 1828, through the Prophet Joseph Smith, He said, 'Behold, this is my doctrine-whosoever repenteth and cometh unto me, the same is my church' (D&C 10:67; italics added.) To Him whose Church this is, membership involves far more than simply being a member of record" ("A Mighty Change Of Heart," Ensign, October 1989, p. 2). If membership in the Lord's spiritual kingdom is wanted, rather than simply mortal Church membership, then setting up stakes is not only wrong but incredibly foolish. To understand that, we must keep in mind that Jesus Christ lived, suffered, and died so that each of us might have the capacity to repent of our sins, obtain a remission of them through baptisms of water and fire, and begin our return to Him. This is His gospel, which in His kindness and mercy He has restored to the earth through modern prophets (see 3 Nephi 27:20-21; D&C 39:6). He has given us scriptures, both ancient and modern, so that we might know how to return to His presence. And finally He has restored the highest or Melchizedek priesthood with its ordinances and keys so that we might have the power, as members of an eternally sealed family unit, to open the heavens and thus return to His presence (see D&C 84:19-22). |
QUOTE |
According to both Brothers Yorgason, as we advance to the "highest" level of spirituality, we may appear to others to be eccentric or unstable, because we follow the Spirit in all things, so our ways are closer to God's ways, rather than man's. |