This is phenominal! LDS_Forever, thank you for the research you've done.
Rather off topic, but... Reading this thread reminds me of two other threads. The first is the thread that discusses if men and women are equal, and the other, I believe was started by Nighthawk, discusses things that were changed in the church and why. |
Superme, thanks for your comments.
This is such a fascinating topic, I really need to discuss this with my husband and take the issue in Prayer to Heavenly Father.
On September 15th, 1884 Eliza R. Snow printed on the Exponent "Should members of the Relief Society go the Bishop for counsel?" the following: (This is an extract from the original)
QUOTE |
....Is it necessary for sisters to be set apart to officiate in the sacred ordinances of washing, anointing, and laying on of hands in administering to the sick? It certainly is not. Any and all sisters who honor their holy endowments, not only have right, but should feel it a duty, whenever called upon to administer to our sisters in these ordinances, which God has graciously committed to His daughters as well as to His sons; and we testify that when administered and received in faith and humility they are accompanied with almighty power. Inasmuch as God our Father has revealed these sacred ordinances and committed them to His Saints, it is not only our privilege but our imperative duty to apply them for the relief of human suffering. We think we may safely say thousands can testify that God has sanctioned the administration of these ordinances by our sisters with the manifestation of His healing influence. |
I just wanted to clarify an important point with regards to the Women having the Priesthood. It seems like they had the Priesthood based on some quotes I provided before but what Brigham Young and others probably meant by "Emma was the one to whom the female priesthood was first given" "Mary A. Young admitted in to the hiest [highest] orderer [order of] Preasthood [sic]." could have perfectly meant about these women obtaining the Second Anointing and no more than that (A member of another site was mentioning this) but I will have to research more about it.
Rather off topic, but... I think I may ask Santa Claus to bring me the 2006 Gospellink edition |
I have heard many of the Sisters give their opinions about this but I think the basic thing we need to remember is we each have a role. Women have their part to play and so do the men. Having it this way places a need for families to be closer together. If the matriarch in the home could give blessings too it would really subdue the "usefulness" of the husband in that way. I know that sounds kind of harsh but I'm just showing how wise the plan of Heavenly Father is with these things.
Funmom:
The Church through a Spokeswoman (timing?), sort of gave a statement with regards to the hype of some groups who are asking that women can be ordained to the Priesthood.
So the Church got the General Relief Society President and the Young Women's General President to talk about women and the leadership roles. The timing is surely not coincidental.