Mitt Romeny Handling Religious Questions
What do you think? Did he answer her in the first instance saying "we" don't have those doctrines right or was he saying she does not have those doctrines right?
Note for other Threads on Mitt:
https://www.bordeglobal.com/foruminv/index....showtopic=20693
Of course, he is trying to distance his religion from his political run, BUT to say we do not have those doctrines down right? She was indeed asking about fundamental things, nothing controversial.
Well, three things:
1) He is a bit naive and does not know all Church history/doctrine.
Or
2) He didn't say "we".
Or
3) He just brushed it off quick so the jounalist would not remain talking about LDS beliefs.
Edited: LDS_forever on 21st Oct, 2006 - 4:31am
QUOTE (LDS_forever) |
He is a bit naive and does not know all Church history/doctrine. |
QUOTE |
I wonder if he really is ready to represent the Church. |
I haven't watched the video yet, but JB is right in that if Mitt Romney were to become President, or even Vice President, he would represent the Church. Not officially, but in effect. The Church would be judged by his actions, his appearance, his charisma. Remember what you have seen about how every time a Mormon commits a crime, that criminal becomes, in effect, a representative of the Church.
Update:
I can't tell what he said in that one spot, but it is fairly clear that he meant that she didn't have them quite right.
Edited: Nighthawk on 21st Oct, 2006 - 2:18pm
He said, "You haven't got those doctrines exactly right...", but when I listened to it again I do not see where she did not get it right, we do believe those things... at least those of us who have dug deeper than the Gospel Principles manual.
QUOTE (LDS_forever) |
If he wins, he may become the President of the United States but not the President of the Church. |