QUOTE |
In the CNN report they are debating exactly what they are making Mickey say... is it: "We will annihilate the Jews" or "The Jews are killing us" |
QUOTE |
we are placing together the cornerstone for the ruling of the world by an Islamic leadership. |
QUOTE |
Going to be a bit difficult to convince anyone that you want peace when this is what you teach your children about the prospective partner of peace. |
Karbala, the point here is the irony of using Mickey Mouse - a US symbol and copyrighted character to start a show to teach children to fight using guns and talk about politics. I do not care how many Jews or Christians or Saints talk nearly bad the same things because the point here is does not make this show right in any degree. To try and defend this is the same as saying... we hate so let us teach our children hate.
Yes, it was a girl on the phone who made that statement. As a matter of fact, based on this phone "conversation" I assume the phone call was fake and set up, Mickey Mouse did not stop her but continued to encourage her statements.
QUOTE |
Host Saraa, a young girl: "Sanabel, what will you do for the sake of the Al-Aqsa Mosque? How will you sacrifice your soul for the sake of Al-Aqsa? What will you do?" Sanabel, young girl on phone: "I will shoot." Farfour, a Mickey Mouse character in a tuxedo: "Sanabel, what should we do if we want to liberate..." Sanable: "We want to fight." Farfour: "We got that. What else?" Saraa: "We want to..." Sanabel: "We will annihilate the Jews." Saraa: "We are defending Al-Aqsa with our souls and our blood, aren't we, Sanabel?" Sanabel: "I will commit martyrdom." |
I wasn't defending the show. This show was sick. They managed to turn mickey the mouse into mickey the rat. It was your (JB) comments about doubting the peaceful intentions of muslims I was answering. This show has been pulled off the air. Even the Palestinians didn't agree with the show.
I totally disagree with bringing hate politics to children. But if you were to ask me whether I would be willing to be a martyr for the liberation of Al-Aqsa I would have to say yes.
QUOTE |
I assume the phone call was fake and set up, Mickey Mouse did not stop her but continued to encourage her statements. |
QUOTE (Karbala @ 9-May 07, 6:24 PM) |
That is a bit paranoid no? The questions asked to the girl were focusing on Al-Aqsa. Most muslims in the world including me are ready to die for the sake of AL-Aqsa. |
Actually, I started the comment about peace. This was a childrens show that aired in Gaza and that is particularly why I mentioned the connection with the peace process. The government has pulled Mickey and his Hamas Friends from the airwaves, which is an encouraging sign that they too saw an issue here.
This was not propaganda. It is easy to say that because it doesn't put a particularly nice light on who made the show and instead of blamming them, we can blame western propaganda. Propaganda is misinformation or half truths. There was nothing misinformed or half truths about the rebroadcast of this show on CNN. This is why the government is pulling the show.
George Bush gets picked on my the media relentlessly, but it is not propaganda. Most of what they say is the actual truth and there was no intent on distributing missinformation, which is what propaganda is... Does the media enjoy showing his screwups...YOU BET...but it isn't propaganda. It is simply capitalizing on the unfortunate truths.
Should somewhere in that telecast, Mickey blessed the Jewish people and that was not reported in the story, THEN we have propaganda by western media. However, there has to be intent on misleading or only presenting half truths.
Propoganda is any bias with an agenda. Doesn't necessary have to be misinformation. An anti-semitic remark or a threat anywhere in the muslim world is immediately picked up. However the same remark made elsewhere about muslims will be confined to the backpages of the local press. Is that not propoganda?
Propaganda is a type of message aimed at influencing the opinions or behavior of people. Often, instead of impartially providing information.
Just to clear the air on that meaning.
All I know is the the topic on the show was not appropriate for children. I also have no doubts that the producers were flavouring the topic and trying to get the children to buy into their political views.
Yes Canadians do it to, as we use children shows to push good manners counting reading ect to a social norm of the time. I remember when KFC first advertised their chicken as finger licking good. The was an enormous out cry because licking your fingers after eating is unacceptable. (my point being just yes every thing we read or watch is not just a here are they fact you make your own conclusion, it is done to get a point or view point across.)