Independent Artists Lead Fight Against Proposed New York City Regulations Limiting Filming, Photography in Public Places
The Mayor's office of Film, Theater, and Broadcasting is considering new permit and insurance regulations for photographers and filmmakers that would radically undermine the First amendment right to photograph and film in public places. If passed they would have harsh consequences for independent and low-budget photographers, filmmakers, journalists, artists, students, tourists, amateurs, and really, anyone with a still or video camera and a sense of curiosity about New York city. We¹re joined by three guests: Beka Economopoulos from the coalition Picture New York, Christopher Dunn from the New York Civil Liberties Union, and independent filmmaker Jem Cohen.
Ref. https://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/02/1455217
QUOTE |
Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. |
Rather off topic, but... My question is: Why does the mayor have an office of Film, Theater, and Broadcasting? To me that is just a stupid waste of government funding to create an unneeded department. |
QUOTE |
I think it would fall under the freedom of press part of the first amendment as I think film is an modern equivalent of the 18th century press. |
QUOTE |
Notice, however, the amendment says that "Congress" shall make no law abridging freedom of the press. Does that apply to a Mayor, who is not part of Congress, but rather part of the Executive branch? |
QUOTE |
In my opinion let people photograph what they want, as long as it is not for a dangerous or illegal purpose (someone casing a building to plan a terrorist act or putting cameras in dressing rooms). |
QUOTE |
But you believe the Constitution protects the right of Hollywood to shoot films anywhere they want for the purpose of entertainment? |
Rather off topic, but... Tortdog, I think our politics would be similar from some of your other postings. I just don't see New York's reasoning in stoping normal photography and filming if it does not step on other people's rights |
The Supreme Court has held that commercial speech enjoys limited protection under the First Amendment. But not to the extent of other speech.
QUOTE |
If it is just someone filming out in public but they do not affect traffic flow then I do not see a city being able to stop filming a photography in a public place. |
To be honest Id hate to have someone photographing me while I was in the mall or on the street without my permission. Its happened to me before and I got really angry.