![>](style_images/Executiv-909/nav_m.gif)
For a conversation to continue, it takes at least two parties. Why you interpret my courtesy in whether to discuss my viewpoint that feedback in the feedback forum is discouraged as to my desire to "control" you perplexes me.
It is courtesy. Not an effort to control.
(abuses Treo for losing edits)
But I do have control over what I discuss. And this conversation on the acceptance of constructive feedback by the powers that be here is over. If you want it to continue, it will have to be with another participant. Edited: tortdog on 12th Sep, 2007 - 4:17pm
QUOTE |
But I do have control over what I discuss. And this conversation on the acceptance of constructive feedback by the powers that be here is over. If you want it to continue, it will have to be with another participant. |
User Tortdog, your account is in danger of deletion due to the high number of your Posts that have to be removed on a daily basis. Take the time to observe, read and understand a Topic before hastily replying. This is your last warning.
I have no idea what you are talking about. With exception of one post that I requested to be deleted, every post I write is on point.
You would have to provide information on the posts you are deleting which you believe are not constructive. I cannot read a bot's mind. Edited: tortdog on 15th Sep, 2007 - 1:39pm
QUOTE (Tortdog) |
I have no idea what you are talking about. |
Obviously I find this disturbing that tortdog's account was closed. I believe he was a valuable member of the community. Too bad he couldn't get along with the administrators.
It seems like a conflict of interest when those who are asked to moderate are also allowed to give their opinion, often as though it is the absolute truth. But I guess this is their sandbox.