Tortdog:
QUOTE |
So one cannot be "white" and see the big deal in that statement? |
Rather off topic, but...
You mean a non-white in a WHITE society? Please explain further. |
So I guess that Jesus Christ could never fully understand racism, unless he is a minority. And if he were a minority, then he could not understand the reverse.
Sorry. But I don't buy that. I don't think that you have to be IN a situation to understand it.
Tortdog:
QUOTE |
So I guess that Jesus Christ could never fully understand racism, unless he is a minority. And if he were a minority, then he could not understand the reverse. |
QUOTE |
Sorry. But I don't buy that. |
Still completely disagree. You seem to insist that a man cannot understand racial discrimination unless he is of that race being discriminated against. I think that's absurd. And, I think that notion is certainly racially biased itself.
Apparently, there is an exception for this rule when the man is perfect, e.g., Christ. But I think that's far too narrow of a viewpoint. I believe man can acquire Christ's ability to empathize with people in bad situations without actually placing themselves in it. I don't think that you have to be a God. You just have to be a person who cares, loves, and listens to the Spirit.
The Spirit counsels us in all our endeavors. Christ is the master teacher. He certainly can enable man to understand the travails of another without having to be in that man's actual shoes.
Tortdog, you are not reading properly. I am NOT saying that a man CANNOT understand another unless they are from that particular background. What I am saying (and to keep in topic with the thread) is that unless YOU are from that particular background (in this case Native/South American) you CANNOT FULLY understand the implications of the label associated with the word "Lamanite" because you have NOT experienced it. I don't care how much you think you "understand" UNLESS you have been called that label, you simply DO NOT KNOW. It is NOT a racially biased statement but one of simply COMMON SENSE.
Rather off topic, but... If you are NOT Black, can you actually say you FULLY understand how it feels to be called a "N..." ? Again, Common sense applies. |
Well good, LDS. That's why I stated you "seem to insist" and then stated the position I was understanding you were communicating to try to close the loop. As opposed to attacking my reading skills, how about doing so in a kind manner, something along the lines of, "No, that's not my viewpoint" and then restating?
Your view is:
QUOTE |
unless YOU are from that particular background (in this case Native/South American) you CANNOT FULLY understand the implications of the label associated with the word "Lamanite" because you have NOT experienced it. |
Tortdog, you take everything as an "attack". Strange perception coming from a lawyer. We are DEBATING but I am seeing your repetitious style of "I disagree" but not adding any "meat" to why or substantiate your answer. You need to read the thread the "Art of Discussion".
QUOTE |
That viewpoint is racist. And I strongly disagree. |
I really don't think that I see a problem with a "lamanite" being the President of the Church. There is no doctrine that I have been able to find that says that this can't happen. I can see where the tribes can get involved, but as so many have pointed out the tribes seem to have only a slight bearing on your specific ancestry.
Rather off topic, but... LDS_Forever and Tortdog, you are both offtopic. I would however like to add my two cents to it. As I can see both your points I think LDS_Forever's comments have a racist tone to them. I may not be able to know exactly what it feels like to be called a Lamanite, I do know what it feels like to called a racial slur. I can equate my feelings over that statement and feel empathy based on that, and it is the same. |