QUOTE |
Again, I can't say whether that is true or not but it does make sense to me. A being such as God would need to be extraordinarily complex if he is to be responsible for everything he is described as. For example, hearing/answering the prayer of every being on the planet who talks to him simultaneously whilst still having the time to smite the ungodly and rewarding the holy-oh and judging the dead. What puzzles me are things like the fact that God - all powerful creator of the universe - needed to "rest on the seventh day" having created the world in six. Why does an immortal being- capable of the creation of everything that exists- need to rest? This is where my warning lights start to flash and I begin to believe its all fables from ancient times. |
Name: Helper
Comments: Yes!"GOD EXISTS" If You saw the technology and observed the complexity inside the Cockpit of the space shuttle, And knew that it couldn't have just happened by chance, Then observed the making of the Human Brain and the Human Body and marvel at its complexity and capabilities then say "THIS ALL HAPPENED BY CHANCE" We all know "WE" couldn't possibly come to that conclusion. So then, We All know that and common sense tells "US" that, "IT Took AND INTELLIGENT Being or CREATOR" In each case...Conclusion: GOD EXISTS!...HOPE THIS HELPS
Source1: Bible
Source2: Collossians: 1 vs. 16
And what about Evolution Helper? Doesn't that explain it more coherently and satisfactorily than any Creation hypothesis? The cock pit of the space shuttle you refer to does not appear out of nowhere. It is made up of hundreds of far more simple pieces that are constructed from the bottom up to form a complex piece of machinery. The "cock pit" does not exist independently of these parts it is the whole resulting from these parts. The observer might wonder at the final result but they know that it is the accumulation of effort rather than the imposition of a fully formed creation. Similarly, as with Evolution, the space shuttles of today are the improved upon descendents of the first space shuttles from the 1960s and will be the basis from which further improved space shuttles will develop in the future.
Now I know the rejoinder here will be that the space shuttle had a designer -us- and that as such we must have had a designer too but the difference between technology and nature is that during the billions of years that Life (of all kinds) has existed on Earth it has developed to cope with its surroundings not the other way around. A space shuttle cannot adapt to a change in climate or the loss of some natural resource: Life can. Some individual species might become extinct but Life itself continues. We are the product of billions of years of evolution and change not because it was designed this way but because of many happy accidents. Had the majority of dinosaurs not become extinct and the rest evolve into birds for example, the mammals from which we developed simply would not have had the chance to flourish as they did.
So, what I think this shows is that in order for life to exist God does not. The universe ticks along without the need for intervention. Such evidence does not deter the faithful however because scientific proof is not required for faith merely the will to be faithful. I continue to be uncertain but leaning towards a humanist perspective because it simply makes more sense-to me at least.
Edited: Dougiep on 6th Jan, 2008 - 6:13pm
Name: Helper
Comments: Hi Dougiep, Don't want to get into anything heated there Dougiep. I respect your point of view, And accept it as Interesting and will contemplate on it...From what I understood from a Scientific point of view, That Simple Matter( Salt and Pepper, or Combination of Chemicals) or Things Left untouched left by itself, doesn't all of sudden, Start to become "Complex Matter" all by its self! On the Contrary, I believe it's Newtons 3rd law of Thermodynamics says Complex matter start to become "Simple Matter" if left alone or untouched, So then How can Evolution be true? Atoms to Fish to Bird to Human etc.?...Simple to Complex? ( it doesn't work that way) So then, I think Creation is much more a Viable Answer...Gen:1vs.1 IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH...Nice talking to You Dougiep...Helper
Source1: Bible Gen:1vs.1
Rather off topic, but... NOTE to Helper: Since you are going to be posting regularly, please consider joining the Community and you can make these Posts at will. |
Even with a scientific approach, if you play a game that annoys a parent to the very ends, one can see how a man even as dedicated to science as Einstein came to believe in at least a higher power. Just keep asking...why/where did that come from/how did that get there and you will eventually come to a spot where you say...I don't know, It was just there or God did it. This is what happened to Einstein. E=MC...2, but where did the E come from?
Sure, we got the big bang theory, but what supplied the bang. OK...a star exploded...how did the star get there. Hmmm...Black hole exploded, strayed from another galaxy, etc... OK, where did that come from? I quickly give up and say...umm..."it was from a higher power".
A few things that Einstein mused upon:
QUOTE |
I want to know how God created this world. I'm not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details. What I am really interested in, is knowing whether God could have created the world in a different way; in other words, whether the requirement of logical simplicity admits a margin of freedom. Why do you write to me "God should punish the English"? I have no close connection to either one or the other. I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him. If God has created the world, his primary worry was certainly not to make its understanding easy for us. To assume the existence of an unperceivable being ... does not facilitate understanding the orderliness we find in the perceivable world. I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world, insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it. |
Name: Helper
Comments: Hi there Dougiep, Sorry, I reread Your input and would like to comment on the second part which is Specifically on Evolution Issue...I'm interested to hear your point of View on these questions ....Out of Millions or Billions of Animals Insects, and Creatures of All sorts Where? are the Fossil Evidences of These Transition Creatures? We should have "Thousands and Thousands" of Skeletal Evidence of these Half Creatures in TRANSITION... and yet "NOTHING of Real Solid Undeniable Proof " I have even heard that the Smithsonian Institution has falsely put in these Transition Skeletons....Secondly:...Why don't we see these Creatures moving or flying around us as we speak? Half Insects, dogs, Weird half creatures and things coming out of the ocean?. Thirdly: Why should Evolution all of a sudden "STOP?" as some Evolutionist claim. ..SO FAR I HAVE FOUND THAT THERE IS NOTHING SOLID TO BACK UP THE EVOLUTION THEORY and so as it "SHOULD BE" it is "JUST A THEORY" A FALSE ONE INDEED...Helper
Source1: Common Sense questions and observation
I will just start by saying I'm not an expert on Evolutionary Theory just an interested layman. However, I will try my best to respond to your specific questions Helper.
QUOTE |
Why don't we see these Creatures moving or flying around us as we speak? Half Insects, dogs, Weird half creatures and things coming out of the ocean?. |
Dougiep, perhaps we just aren't as important as we like to think we are...
All the galaxies and solar systems...who created those or what created those. Where did that material come from to create that. If we go to a E=MC2 thought, you come down to pure energy. Where did that pure energy come from... Eventually, you have to say..."I don't know", "It was just there" or "A higher power provided it". You can chose to believe one of the first 2 answers, but you will have really come to no solution or answer. The 3rd answer requires a belief in a power that is outside of our common logical boundaries of Natural Law...but perhaps the logical conclusion.