data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5978e/5978e8203440481250d7809668b0a8e1122b3a0c" alt=">"
This is posted in response to tenaheff's suggestion regarding a person convicted of federal law in the USA while living in a state with a different law.
One example is Robin Prosser, who was arrested on federal charges while living in a state where medical use of marijuana was legal.
I don't want this to become a debate about medical marijuana -- that's a different topic -- but a discussion about differences between state and federal law and the injustice of prosecution for those differences.
Roz Edited: FarSeer on 3rd Jul, 2004 - 3:02pm
International Level: Ambassador / Political Participation: 595 59.5%
This is a good topic and I am surprised no one has taken it up. As far as I understand doesn't Federal Law have a command over State law and policies? However I do not see how that would apply in the case you gave unless the guy was wanted in other States or did an act that was a felony in addition to the marijuana charge?
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3241 100%
The Federal Government wouldn't have a "different law" to that of any State if it kept within its Constitutional bounds.
State law should be the one that applies in 99% of cases.
Dubhdara.
International Level: Junior Politician / Political Participation: 100 10%