Do you think is fair that this guy must pay child support? Why/Why not?
QUOTE |
The donor was a married doctor at a Long Island hospital in the late 1980s when he donated his sperm to a female hospital resident who was trying to have a baby with her lesbian partner, the Post reported. Although the donor gave up all claims and rights to the child, he allowed his name to be put on the birth certificate. For several years after the boy's birth in 1989, the doctor sent the child gifts and money and cards signed "Dad" and had regular contact with the child, the Post reported. However, when the boy moved to Oregon with his mother and her partner in 1993, regular contact stopped. Since then, the man's contact with the child consisted of seven phone calls and one brief meeting over the past 15 years. A New York family court judge ruled last month that the man must now pay child support for the boy, now 18 and heading to college, the Post reported. |
18 years later, and the man hasn't ever really been a father? And the kid is going off to college? Nonsense, this man isn't any more a father to this child then a man in the moon. He donated sperm to help her out, it was a good cause, and now she is taking advantage of it. The 'kid' is really a grown adult now at 18, I can't imagine why a judge would rule in her favor. Just nonsense. Why is it the man who gets penalized in every situation?
Maybe the judge has morale issues with it or wants to use it as an example of how a test tube father giver should behave - in other words keep in contact with the mother to see where your seed has been? Just a guess.
Maybe, or maybe he is telling the man to be a father or don't be a father. Don't fiddle around like your really a dad then just ignore him. If you want to act like a father then be a father, other wise just leave him alone and don't lead him on. Who knows, I just don't think he should have to pay child support in this situation. Seems hokie to come after him for child support 18 years later doesn't it?
Normally I would agree a sperm donor has no legal ties to the child. In this case I think the donor chose his own destiny and should pay support to the child.
1) He maintained contact with the child and signed DAD on many monetary gifts. One would only do this if they felt responsible for this child. If it was just a hey I would like to help he would just silently hand cash to the mothers.
2) Why the heck is his name on the birth certificate if he has no vested interest in the child? This is not giving up all rights and claims on the child this is legally taking liberty to say hey this child is mine.
I think it is more than likely he is a kind person who enjoyed helping out with this child and likely would have stayed as an active male role model in the child's life. Then when the move was made the relation went to the way side due to distance and inconvenience. When this happened mommies got a little upset at no money being tossed their way and headed to court knowing full well his name was on the birth certificate thus making him daddy.
"I went about 3.5 years, two or three times a week," said Whitehurst, who estimated he"d raked in more than $12,000.
Then six years ago, Whitehurst, 48, married with children and living in Los Gatos, Calif., was contacted by a 14-year-old girl who said she was his daughter and that she had obtained his information from the cryobank he"d visited. Ref. Source 2
There are a number of important points:
"¢ In the late 80's, the decision to place his name on the birth certificate was most likely due to state laws at that time. The other option was to keep it blank but placing the same-sex partner's name there almost certainly wouldn't have been allowed.
"¢ There were no written contracts described in the segment leaving the arrangement open for litigation.
"¢ One has to examine what was the intent of the arrangement in the context of state law. The intent was to donate but to not father.
"¢ If the sperm donor is considered a parent, what was the same-sex partner to be called that did not bear the child?
"¢ The minimal contact throughout the years was closer to that of an Uncle and not a father or parent. Contact alone does not bestow parenthood.
"¢ The awarding of child support for an adult of 18 is quite odd. Most child support ends at age 18 or when high school ends, whichever comes last.
Moral of the story-
"¢ Legal contracts are needed with legal representation for all parties involved when open (I.e., not anonymous) procedures are used
"¢ The state statutes must be adhered to and they often differ from state-to-state.
"¢ Always remember that the state has the obligation to protect the child so a judge will commonly rule in whatever is best for the child and not necessarily the adults. The state never wants to foot the bill for the care of a child if there is a (Genetic) father nearby that can pick up the tab.
"¢ Designated sperm donation can be a mess for both donors and recipients. Anonymous donation through a qualified facility in combination with a skilled reproductive facility is ideal.
Craig R. Sweet, M.D.
Reproductive Endocrinologist
Embryo Donation International, P.L.
Specialists in Reproductive Medicine & Surgery, P.A.