For me the comparison is like two very spoiled children in a small tree house arguing over how they want to expand it. There will be name calling, threats and maybe some pushes but in the end they will get along.
International Level: Senior Politician / Political Participation: 177 17.7%
I love the way they write these opinion pieces and throw out all the statistics and quote them as facts. Remember, it was these same statistics that assured us President Trump was going to be soundly beaten by Clinton, even losing states like FL, NC, and AZ. The NY Times had Clinton's chance of victory at 95% on election day… and then you could watch their handy dandy calculator all day change the probability.
Yeah, how'd those statistics work? So, when this left leaning author writes this stuff, remember the source. And do the same thing when it's a right leaning author writing an opinion piece. Many of these are wildly inaccurate. Oh, and regarding treason, that is a heavy burden of proof. Simply taking information from a source, whatever that source, is not treason.
My goodness, will President Trumps oppositions stop at nothing? Had a couple of right leaning psychologists tried this with President Obama they would be accused of racism.
Sorry, I had to edit this because as I thought about it the scary thing is there are those people out there who will believe this. They will believe this because they are so rabidly intolerant of people with another POV that they will convince themselves this is true. And this is just as true of the right as of the left when they hear something preposterous about people they disagree with. It is a sad state of affairs we find ourselves in.
Edited: Abnninja on 18th Jul, 2017 - 6:00pm
It is entirely true that multiple well respected psychiatrists have expressed the opinion that Trump should be evaluated on suspicion of mental illness.
It is also entirely true that multiple well respected psychiatrists have given a preliminary diagnosis of extreme narcissism, among other mental issues, breaking the usual code of conduct for such matters.
These are not crackpot doctors, they're not pretend experts, and while I suspect at least a few of them would be willing to say almost anything to get rid of Trump, all of them being describable as such would beggar belief.
ICH is spinning this into more than it is, as is expected of a crackpot "News" organization. But it doesn't take any spinning for there to be reason for concern.
Edited: daishain on 18th Jul, 2017 - 6:21pm