![>](style_images/Executiv-909/nav_m.gif)
The Church also released this news about not being judgmental on people's immigration status and callings.
Two Branch Presidents in Utah has been deported, one to Guatemala and the other to El Salvador:
Name: Matthew
Comments: Why would anyone support ILLEGAL immigrants anyways? They come into our country without declaring themselves, they rob our social services and taxes, they consume our produce and rob jobs from those who could have gotten it and live a lie. Religion or not they have to do the right thing. If I went to their country and did that how would they like it?
Illegal immigration bill repeal backer calls lawmakers who drafted it 'traitors' to Utah
At the same news conference, Brandon Beckham basically demanded the GOP-controlled Utah Legislature repeal HB116 by Sept. 30. The bill would establish a guest worker program for undocumented immigrants in 2013. "Those who drafted this bill are traitors to Utah and they will be held accountable by voters in 2012," he said with Sen. Stephen Urquhart, R-St. George, and Rep. Chris Herrod, R-Provo, and others standing behind him in the Capitol rotunda. Both lawmakers favor a repeal. Ref. Source 7
U.S. Deporting more illegal-immigrant convicts, and even more non-convicts
WASHINGTON - Since the Bush administration rolled out a program in 2008 that shares fingerprints between local police and federal immigration agents, about 30,000 illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes have been deported. But even more immigrants - roughly 33,000 - have been thrown out of America without ever being convicted of non-immigration crimes. Ref. Source 6
Name: Cit
Country:
Comments: The argument the Mormon church uses that we must help those who made it here ILLEGALLY is ridiculous. Should we help the whole world if they made it here illegally? Maybe the Mormon church should help the people in those countries so they can feel good about staying right where they are!
Listen guys this is how I look at it. I have read alot of people writing about how they can't accept the Church giving "illegal" members temple recommends, and Church callings, because it conflicts with our belief that we should follow the law of the land. But if the Church leaders don't have a problem with it, then why should I? Here is why. Yes our scriptures and doctrines say that we should follow the laws of this land. But when was this written? Was it written yesterday? No! It was written almost 2 centuries ago. For a people with completely different problems and circumstances. I am not saying that commandments of God giving to His children in the past is not applicable now, but that we must accept that problems now are different than problems then (for which such statements as "We believe in...obeying, honoring and sustaining the law were written.) Can we honestly believe that there will never come a time when we have to choose between following the Prophet or the goverment? So then what will we choose? Will we say that the Church is disobeying the laws of the land, and criticize the leaders because of it? I believe now is such a time. Is illigal immigration illigal? (reduntant I know) Yes, obviously. So one will naturaly assume that they don't meet the requirements for membship in the Church, or at least have callings and such; but our leaders have said otherwise. Now we are left to decide wether we will accept that or not. So then again I ask. Can we really expect the "advice" and council of the Church leaders to "always" be the same as the "goverments?" I don't. What good is a living prophet today then if we can't accept his guidance? Are we really going to sit here and say "but the scriptures say this, or the Article of Faith say that, etc...?" I mean I'm pretty sure they know exactly what the Articles of Faith say, or what commandments the Lord gave Joseph Smith in D&C. Yet the guidance today is what it is. It may appear to contradict what we have already been commanded but it's not the first time and I doubt it will be the last. Illigal immigration is definitely a problem, but with regards to wether it gives someone in the Church the privelage of entering the temple or having callings I believe the issue has been settled. Any other problems with it I belief is just a trial of faith in the leaders. (and I'm not saying this in a judgemental way at all! It's just something that people are going to have to get over or it might destroy their faith.)
With your position we can begin to rationalize just about everything the government does. You're also looking at it from one point only, a LDS one, there is also the question of honesty. I posted this point some months ago, Source 5 and no one has answered yet.