Stone, Wood, Brick or Steel?
How do people decide wether to build their home out of Stone, Wood, Brick or Steel?
Its all about money versus value. Overall, brick is a great value but is more expensive. Wood is much cheaper but doesn't last as long, but also allows more flexibility than brick or stone. Steel houses are cheap and strong, but tend to have an echo quality to them that I don't like. When it comes down to it, brick and stone last the longest for the money and I would like to build a house out of brick when I get the chance.
I agree cost is a factor but I think so is convenience. Wood homes last as long as brick or maybe longer but take more to upkeep. Brick takes far less work annually than wood siding, but wood is often chose as it is warmer than brick and many prefer the softer look in areas where many vacation (ie cottage county).
If money is not an issue I often find people will build with steel and brick. Low cost housing seems to usually look at wood, but for me it is such a danger because of being toppled over from tornadoes / earthquake, termites, etc.
QUOTE |
danger because of being toppled over from tornadoes / earthquake, termites, etc. |
Krakyn, most homes here are built with concrete and either cement or clay blocks that are then plastered to a smooth finish. In other words only a serious earthquake could move them. Some people also use heavy steel I-beams as the main frame, but I have found that only the more affluent do this as it just a matter of reducing the time. Floors are also cast with concrete so there are no squeaking sounds.
Interesting JB, I could see a unreinforced wall like you are describing standing up to earth quake, but would not the unreinforced walls not crack and crumble as bad or worse then wood? I would like also to keep in mind wood made today is not of the same quality as the old homes made here years ago which leads me to think a steel home is best and cost of wood is quickly rising reducing the issue of cost of steel.
Also do you place an insulation layer then an interior wall to make the house better insulated? I realize cold is not and issue but what of heat? I could see houses partially underground being an interesting venture in a hot climate but the earthquake might pose a real big issue on that, same as a typhoon or Hurricane.
We seldom see a poured concrete floor in a home it usually is just the foundation (which is unreinforced typically on newer homes). The cost of pouring two floors in concrete would be very expensive. It sounds like the homes are well built to last. New homes here I was told by some big contractors are now designed for a life expectancy of 25 to 40 years at which point they feel the urban development will cause them to be torn down and higher density housing or commercialization of the land will occur. I used to attend annual meeting were engineers and contractors got together to talk about green housing and sustainability of housing. never once was natural disasters talked of due to our climate here I would assume.
QUOTE (Krakyn) |
...but would not the unreinforced walls not crack and crumble as bad or worse then wood? |