Mousetrails, you seem to have a problem with reading my replies and bent set on sticking with playing a tune over and over, but here it is:
QUOTE (JB) |
I see the Food Shortage Controversy as A LOT bigger than Mousetrails... this is about people in HIGHER more POWERFUL places, places where decisions are made that affect continents and hemispheres, not five employees on a farm on the Western end of the USA. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
I have to agree with Krakyn here. THe oil companies have done all they can to make sure we are dependant on their oil. THey have gone out of their way to suppress the technology that would have put us in a position of using a lot less fuel and lessening our dependance on foreign oil. The fact of making sure the car industry does not put out a big block V8 that gets over 50 miles per gallon proves it. Making sure that the electric cars do not have compatible chargers is just another example. Congress not giving money for research and development of alternate fuels is a third way to see this.
Now we are getting quickly to a big juncture. DO we keep using food to produce fuel or use it to help feed the hungry of this world? This is a question that you and I can not answer. IT is a question that can only be answered by the governments. I remember a time where corn, wheat and soybeans sat on the ground rotting because we could sale food to other countries because we were not on friendly terms with them. I know a lot of fields still go unused because a farmer does not get paid if the crops he harvested go bad from sitting on the ground. Why should the farmers suffer because the governments want to play mean games on each other. If I was a farmer I would be move than willing to sale my corn to the ethanol plants because it is a sure bet they will buy it. IF I grow corn or soybeans to help solve world hunger I have no guarantee that the government is going to let it be sold for that purpose. Now everyone is getting mad because there is so much food shortage in the world. I think the governments needs to do something about this.
mousetrails please do stay you have seen more then us and yes I do wish to hear what you have to say as how else can I learn? I have always enjoyed the company of those older then myself for that very reason.
I also know sometimes a man knows something is wrong and it can be very hard to put on paper in a way that conveys both the feeling and importance that is delivered in person.
My dad always spoke poorly of the hippie generation and he is your age (72 to be exact). I know much of how he grew and lived even my son still feels the call of the dirt. I wake more and more often wishing I never chose to leave the land but what is done is done. My dad spoke poor of them because he felt the illicit lifestyle would bring damnation down on them and the country as a result since they are the future leaders.
But no matter the cause for the oil prices and the shortage of food the question is how do we get going again.
I do see the small farmer being the key to this answer problem is who is left that has the know how and the gumption to do it. I am a great example yup I cna go work the land but will I nope. I am getting to darn close to filling my pension. The after that I might but only very small scale for a small number of years. I fight with this as I should be teaching what I know to my boys. My grandfather could have built anything he ever needed with his hands...My father lost some and I now none of what my grandfather knew by his own choice. He knew the toll smithing took on one body. But it is thin thinking that has caused us to get where we are depending on other to do what we should do our selves.
International Level: Senior Politician / Political Participation: 188 18.8%
UN sets up food crisis task force
A United Nations task force is to be set up to tackle the crisis triggered by rising global food prices.
Ref. https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7372393.stm
I am glad to see they are at least looking to produce more in their own countries as that helps every one in a poor country. I hope heavy levies or fines will be issued on countries that are hording or preventing export on their own surplus stocks. We need to support each other world wide and in our own countries.
It is hording and high tax levies placed on certain countries for other political reasons that are going to hurt us. At the same time we can not ignore child labor issues or nuclear threats. A very difficult balance but food to the staving must occur.
I think pressure need to put on the States and Canada to encourage the vast unused farm lands here to be re-cultivated as we alone could likely put an end to the shortage if that was done and I would not be shocked if they could also produce enough to met some demands for biofuels also. But only if the governments make it a priority.
International Level: Senior Politician / Political Participation: 188 18.8%
I think that the government of the USA will not make it a high priority at all. For some reason Bush feels that what has done in foreign policy is enough. IF the countries are starving that is not his problem. I think it will be nice to get someone else into the white house after 8 years of a monkey in there.
Run JB? I have no intention of running. I said I was going to go to a more peaceful place, but I'll give it one more shot. I don't have any problem at all reading your replies. What I'm playing over and over is your very own words. You, Krakyn, and Kntoran seem to be stuck on greed and people "in high places" starving the world.
I don't feel the least bit guilty about how I have treated an employee either in my business, or in packing houses where I was foreman. I'll try to make myself very plain and simple. You accuse me of feeling guilty for the way I have treated people. You have accused me of being one of the greedy ones in high places.
JB
QUOTE |
if you are not "the greedy ones in high places" then what are you on about? |
QUOTE |
Excuse me, who started this Thread? Who decides which way this Thread leads? I am talking about conspiracies therefore I go in all the directions possible to build on what I am talking about. |
QUOTE |
this is about people in HIGHER more POWERFUL places, places where decisions are made that affect continents and hemispheres, not five employees on a farm on the Western end of the USA. |
QUOTE |
maybe someone else will entertain whatever concept / perspective you have, because I just do not understand your rants in relation to what I've been saying, |
QUOTE |
Third, you said something that means it is time for a good butt whooping, even if you are my senior: |
International Level: Politician / Political Participation: 102 10.2%
What I see here is typical bureaucracy. We have a couple of massive buildings in Washington DC called the Department of Agriculture. In that building, they help guide/control what farmers make and dont make. As with all bureaucracies, these things move slow...real slow. Most cannot remember when the US was making so much tobacco that the price to grow it basically equaled what they could sell it for and it took years to get that fixed. The same thing has happened over the years with wheat and corn. Over production and the price bottom falls out and the farmers become poor and get out of the business. The key thing is that it took years in each of these cases to get the right amount to the market. Well, the market has just started taking off for grain and after years and years of telling farmers not to grow anything on their lands...now they have to get them started again. What does that entail. Well, it means, stop paying the farmers to not grow things and then they will have to start growing crops or get out of farming (but in truth many have been out of farming for many years and getting paid for it). Well, that is a bit of a problem now for some farmers that didnt upgrade or maintain their equipment during the years of getting paid not to farm. There are solutions, but they will need to be developed and agreed on...and that in government time means years. If the rewards for farming go up (price received), then you will many more people to go into farming and or restart their farms, but the payback has to be there.
The only thing I get concerned about is the use of food as a combatant against the price of oil. I could actually invision food production being left on its own and the food output being blamed on the oil price. The goal would be to drive down the oil price which is purely over inflated with fear and emotions.
Governments are incapable of moving fast for anything. Especially, the US government which is specifically designed that way to ensure few radical changes over shot periods. This is why there is no chance that we can immediately switch our infrastructures over to solar power, wind power, coal gasification, ethanol production and restarting of farms.
Edited: Vincenzo on 1st May, 2008 - 7:50am
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 863 86.3%