Alma teaches us about faith unto knowledge. If we have faith and believe, that faith can become knowledge in that particular thing. In Alma 32:26-43, we learn a lot about faith.
Clifton made the same point I wanted to.
What you know is what you have felt! You pray about Joseph Smith, and the spirit lets you KNOW that Joseph Smith actually saw Jesus Christ and Heavenly Father. The spirit tells you that the book of mormon is true, That this Church is Christ's Church.
These thing we know, because have felt the spirit! There is still faith in that we don't know all things! But we know what we are doing.
Lectures on Faith says it best
Thats fine if thats how YOU view it! But like Alma teaches
"Yea, your knowledge is perfect in that thing, and your faith is dormant; and this because you know"
So when people get up to bare there Testimony on Sunday! They Do KNOW! They know what the spirit has told them! They know this more then just believe the spirit told them this, its more then just believing.
As we grow in our Knowledge (Not just belief) and obey that knowledge then the spirit doesn't help us anymore and that is when we get the second comforter, (Meaning Jesus Christ).
The difference between knowledge and belief is in the level of corresponding doubt. It's a subjective statement and does not correlate to objective truth. I think a lot of people are dishonest about how much doubt they actually have. Or else, people's rationalities are too easily swayed by their passions which causes them to overcome doubt that should naturally be there.
It is so often viewed by church practitioners that the more convinced one is of gospel truth the better, whereas I, from my viewpoint, find a person who contains himself to only stating belief in the gospel to be one with greater moral integrity and greater capability in bridling her passions. Salvation is not a result of how incredibly (The etymology of "incredible" is "not credible" by the way) convinced one is of the Gospel, it's in how well they live it.
I find this to be a deviancy in the culture that is in need of correction. I believe it's a result of an inflated sense of evangelism and a want for conformity.
Furthermore, I don't think it does good for the church's image. An outsider seeing the evidence that is sited of the Saint's "knowledge" of their beliefs will see the incongruity of evidence to conviction. It makes us look like radicals. Of course, we shouldn't change ourselves for the sake of image. We should change for the sake of integrity.
Name: Alaskann
Country:
Comments: A person can be given confirmation by the Spirit without necessarily having their calling and election made sure. Granted many people seem to profess knowledge based on belief, but there are things I know are true because the Spirit has bourne powerful witness so that I could not deny it. There are other things I believe to be true but have not yet reached the point of knowledge. I do not believe I am unique in these experiences.
I think when they say they know they mean they have an extreme testimony. They are almost positive he exists. When I say that I mean all they need is to see him. Some people on the other hand just prefer that word instead of believe. Me personally I know that the Gospel is true, but by know I mean I believe as much as I can at this point in time.
In Alma 32, we read that faith is not to have a "perfect" knowledge. The implication is that there is such a thing as "imperfect" knowledge. According to the scriptures, seeing is perfect knowledge. Thus, anything that isn't seeing with our own eyes might be considered "imperfect" knowledge. We often say such things as "I knew you were going to say that." That is considered an acceptable usage of the word "know," even though it is obviously not "perfect" knowledge. So, when people bear their testimonies saying, "I know that the Church is true," I also accept that as an acceptable usage of the word "know," even though I do not usually consider it to be "perfect" knowledge.
"Imperfect" knowledge I would associate with faith, which Hebrews 11 defines as "assurance of things hoped for, evidence of things not seen." If we have "evidence" of something that we have not seen, that is essentially faith, which could also be called "imperfect" knowledge. Still, faith is more than just belief because, as the Prophet Joseph Smith taught, in the Lectures on Faith, faith is the principle of action in all intelligent beings. Thus, faith is such a strong belief that it moves us to action or obedience to the commandments, whereas a mere belief does not do that.