I think this has something to do with it. If people are losing their jobs as places of employment cuts back on jobs they are going to lose their homes and have less and less to eat. I hope that local governments and others can help the homeless get food and keep warm through the winter months.
Rather than keep a house all closed up because of foreclosure the least they could do is let a family stay there especially during this season at least.
International Level: New Activist / Political Participation: 23 2.3%
I could understand the kindness involved in such an act but there are some logical things to consider:
1. When you let them in how do you get them out?
2. What do you do if they destroy the place? Yes, you want them to have shelter not turn the house into a barn.
3. How do you select which house gets which people?
4. If you are going to put people in there why not get the original occupants who lost the home in the first place return.
5. Placing homeless people in a house seriously devalues the rest of the area.
6. What about the payment and upkeep of electricity, water, etc.?
International Level: Junior Politician / Political Participation: 100 10%
Those are some good questions Debate. I believe that letting people stay in homes up for foreclosure is not the answer. Where were these people before and where will they go after? I think the 'after' is more important since putting someone in a home that is not theirs can lead to many problems.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
I believe that if your home has gone into foreclosure in this crisis there should be ways to try and keep the people in their home IF they show that they are caring for the home. I believe many banks war willing to work with the homeowners if they are in straights due to job loss or wage loss. If the homeowner has the money to pay but decided not to then yes kick them out.