Do you feel that old symbols that have 'lost' through war, etc. Should be revived because someone says it is 'freedom of speech'? Should it be shown or given 'respect' if it is a symbol of hate or evil?
From USA Today:
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
QUOTE |
To begin with, that symbol is far older than the Third Reich. It has metaphysical meanings that date back thousands of years |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 100%
QUOTE |
Do you feel that old symbols that have 'lost' through war, etc. Should be revived because someone says it is 'freedom of speech'? Should it be shown or given 'respect' if it is a symbol of hate or evil? |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
OK,
Let me see if I can answer you in context of the thread.
Just because some ignorant dummy views something as a symbol of evil, doesn't mean it actually is.
For instance, The Confederate Flag.
The black people don't have enough sense to realize the Civil War wasn't even remotely about them. That was Lincoln's PR.
The Southern states would never have started a war over slavery. How stupid can you get?
The war was over State's rights versus the Federal Big Brother telling everybody what to do. That was worth a war.
If the blacks view the Confederate flag as a symbol of evil, too bad for them.
If some View the Swastika as a symbol of evil, too bad for them.
Is that more in context?
QUOTE |
If the blacks view the Confederate flag as a symbol of evil, too bad for them. If some View the Swastika as a symbol of evil, too bad for them. Is that more in context? |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
QUOTE |
@ Stranger, I see what you are tying to say, but I guess it the answer to you would be one word only... [center]Empathy[/center] |