Close Topic Options

Maximum World Greed Armies

Maximum World Greed Armies

From observation I noticed that you can place a lot of men on one country (I just placed something like 51 against KNtoran) and then essentially win the game if you are playing first. This works MOST times, but not all the time. Nevertheless, do you think there should be a maximum amount of men that can be put on one country during placement? What are your thoughts?

Armies Greed World Maximum

I am thinking that the way it is now is ok. One can always place a large army on amy country and walk all over the place. Two can do it too. Makes the game a little more interesting if they both do it I would think. If you limit the amount that can be placed it can work against you too.

Maximum World Greed Armies Reviews RPG & Card Board

I can see your point JB--as I felt bad (not REALLY BAD though ) after taking first turn and having a great turn with the dice--I felt like I had too good of luck! At the same time since we have two games going and he is first on the other one--I hoped he would do as well (maybe not SO well!) So I voted for the same as it is.

I think though that if there was a limited amount of conquering during the first round, it might give the others more of a chance. On the other hand, you said it is random so it doesn't matter as even if you pay the extra 5 FP points to create a game--it doesn't mean you will go first. Does that make sense?

Armies Greed World Maximum

There are pros and cons to both but again it is really the first round that it makes the biggest impact. Also later the first person has to start the trading and gets the short end of the stick there as well.

Armies Greed World Maximum

Krakyn said:

That is true as well--didn't think about that. I guess with all the pros and cons it is understandable why the game is titled RISK!

Maximum World Greed Armies

OK seems like we will shelve this idea for Community RISK Online, however I do not know if I can promise that for the next version.