Sand vs Steel In Ballistic Tests

Sand Steel Ballistic Tests - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 15th Dec, 2016 - 7:57am

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

Posts: 4 - Views: 358
Post Date: 14th Dec, 2016 - 2:18pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Sand vs Steel In Ballistic Tests

Sand absorbs high-speed ballistic impact better than steel

Scientists have found that when a projectile is fired at a sand block at high speed, it absorbs more than 85 per cent of the energy exerted against it. This ability to resist the impact increases with the speed of the projectile, even at high velocities. Ref. Source 8u.

Sponsored Links:
15th Dec, 2016 - 5:20am / Post ID: #

Tests Ballistic Steel Sand

85% is a lot I can see the application of this in making better bunkers but I don't know how much value it will have as a replacement for steel.


International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 34 ActivistPoliticianActivist 3.4%


Post Date: 15th Dec, 2016 - 5:28am / Post ID: #

Sand vs Steel In Ballistic Tests
A Friend

Sand vs Steel In Ballistic Tests History & Civil Business Politics

They're surprised by this outcome? Ideal impact absorption has always existed in the margins between fluidity and rigidity.

15th Dec, 2016 - 7:57am / Post ID: #

Tests Ballistic Steel Sand

Its more about application for me than what it can do on its own. In other words its nice that it can stop penetration how can same material be applied to a vehicle or a vest and still give you the 85%.


International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 34 ActivistPoliticianActivist 3.4%



 
> TOPIC: Sand vs Steel In Ballistic Tests
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,