Pat Mooney on the Dangers of Geoengineering and Manipulating the Planet to Combat Climate Change
Supporters of geoengineering have proposed radical ways to alter the planet to decrease the level of greenhouse gas emissions. Proposals include creating artificial volcanoes to pollute the atmosphere with sulfur particles, fertilizing the oceans and placing sun-deflecting aluminum foil in the sky. But opposition is growing to geoengineering. Here at the World Peoples' Summit on Climate Change in Bolivia, the ETC Group is launching an international campaign against geoengineering experiments. We speak with the group's founder, Pat Mooney, a Right Livelihood Award winner. Ref. Source 4
These are experiments, maybe we shouldn't be doing experiments on our planets atmosphere. I am wary that we could cause more harm than good. The planet balances itself naturally. If we start messing with that it could be bad. Though we already messing with it with our pollution ect . . . Sounds like a good idea but if we do this we must be very careful.
A Debate on Geoengineering: Vandana Shiva vs. Gwynne Dyer
Supporters of geoengineering have proposed radical ways to alter the planet to decrease the level of greenhouse gas emissions. Proposals include creating artificial volcanoes to pollute the atmosphere with sulfur particles, fertilizing the oceans and placing sun-deflecting aluminum foil in the sky. But opposition is growing to geoengineering. We host a debate between Indian environmentalist, scientist, philosopher and eco-feminist, Vandana Shiva, and geopolitical analyst and columnist, Gwynne Dyer.
Ref. Source 9
I’m highly suspicious of any geo-engineering that occurs, given the toxicity of what’s sprayed into the atmosphere or the knowledge that’s existed for decades about weather modification. I don’t know if it’s on YouTube anymore (Could be on Rumble or BitChute), but there’s a really informative documentary on it called The Dimming.
Well "Climate scientists say that the world must keep global temperatures from rising more than 1.5C (2.7F) to avoid some of the worst projected effects of climate change." So, like it or not, this is needed solutions, since other known alternative won't drop the temperature drastically or fast enough, its just a preventative measure to keep it under the threshold.
Eitherway the nature already done that anyway by spewing volcanic ash and sulfur just not in specific time and place that needed tweaking, in the end the real problem are the "Politic" and the bickering for their personal gain and fear being invaded or hijacked by this ecomanipulation resulting of it going nowhere, like they cannot form something like UN type for this decision.
It’s a fact that C02 is actually good for the planet and for vegetation. We know this from the fact that plants give off oxygen and take in C02. The problem with climate change/global warming isn’t man-made C02 “pollution” but geo-engineering.