This absolutely disgusts me.
QUOTE |
This absolutely disgusts me. |
International Level: Activist / Political Participation: 29 2.9%
Oh my gosh, is this true or it us just an urban legend?. I cannot believe that an experiment like that could take place without the government doing anything about it!.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
This is a joke as I ever seen one. It is impossible to something like this would be real and not be use the word "prison" in the same sentence .. There is no way any country would tolerate this and if one my find such a country then both the organization and the government that alow this would suffer such sanctions that it would not worth it.
I found this hard to believe when I read it, so decided to find the actual study details from the EPA themselves. It would seem this OCA organization has reworded the study to make it seem more harmful than it is. According to the OCA:
QUOTE |
new proposed study in which infants in participating low income families will be monitored for health impacts as they undergo exposure to known toxic chemicals over the course of two years. |
QUOTE |
Participants are not required to use pesticides or to change any of their regular household routines or how they normally use bug sprays (pesticides)..... No. You and your child will not experience any risks from participating in this study. We will not ask any parent to apply pesticides in their home to be a part of this study. You are not required to change any of your regular household routines. Researchers at EPA are very sensitive to issues associated with children participating in this study. The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by four independent institutional review boards for the protection of human participants |
QUOTE |
led by Bush appointees |
International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 24.1%
That's a huge relief, but I'm still kind of hesitant to accept it. I just don't like the idea of children being used for research when chemicals are concerned. I just imagine it putting pressure on a child, even if it they aren't doing anything more than they were before.
QUOTE |
That's a huge relief, but I'm still kind of hesitant to accept it. I just don't like the idea of children being used for research when chemicals are concerned. |
International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 32%
Yes, we must understand that if the research was not done, the children would still be 'exposed' so to speak as they currently are. The government could come and say "Don't use pesticides more than twice a day" but they wouldn't have any proof or backing, so what good what that do. What the EPA is saying is that in the current conditions, if pesticides are going to be used as they are being used, then let's research the possible effects it may be having on children. Then the government can make a statement based on some facts. Nothing wrong with that in my book. What ticks me off is when these so called humanitarian organizations get on their political soap box and twist words around to make it seem worse than it is.
International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 24.1%