I wanted to put this thread for a while and here it is. If you all read some of the interviews that Pres. Hinckley had with Larry King you would realize that he answered questions about both: Homosexuality and Plural Marriage.
In the old times, the Church described homosexuality as an "abomination" now the tone of it have go down in a significant manner.
In recent years the Church seem to become more "understanding" towards homosexuality maybe based on social pressure?, please Babylon? (as Nighthawk usually say). Whatever the reason, the Church seem to condemn Plural Marriage in the strongest of terms compared to homosexuality(even though we have practised Plural Marriage in the past). Here is a comparison for your analysis:
Homosexuality
"People inquire about our position on those who consider themselves so-called gays and lesbians. My response is that we love them as sons and daughters of God. They may have certain inclinations which are powerful and which may be difficult to control. Most people have inclinations of one kind or another at various times. If they do not act upon these inclinations, then they can go forward as do all other members of the Church. If they violate the law of chastity and the moral standards of the Church, then they are subject to the discipline of the Church, just as others are." (President Gordon B. Hinckley, "What Are People Asking About Us?" (ENSIGN, November 1998) ).
Polygamy
"I wish to state categorically that this Church has nothing whatever to do with those practicing polygamy. They are not members of this Church. Most of them have never been members. They are in violation of the civil law. They know they are in violation of the law. They are subject to its penalties. The Church, of course, has no jurisdiction whatever in this matter.
If any of our members are found to be practicing plural marriage, they are excommunicated, the most serious penalty the Church can impose. Not only are those so involved in direct violation of the civil law, they are in violation of the law of this Church...."
Whole statement here:
https://lds.about.com/library/weekly/previo...s/aa042799b.htm
Could you all see the "tone" of both statements?. It seems to me that the Church is condemning more strongly Plural Marriage than Homosexuality. What's your view?.
I see the tone of those statements as specifically related to the context of the specific issues involved. First, let me say (and it is doctrinal) that any sexual abberation is very serious, whether unauthorized polygamy, homosexuality, old fashioned adultery, or any variant of these. Is an otherwise moral gay man in more trouble than a man who habitually cheats on his wife and destroys his family? I think not. Sexual sin is an abomination, whatever its packaging, and "degrees" of seriousness are not always applicable.
Homosexuality has gained increased popularity in recent years, and part of the reason is its addictive nature. Perhaps the spread of pornography is a major cause. President Kimball expounds on the connection between pornography and homosexuality in The Miracle of Forgiveness. In our world, it is understandable how some people, even those with strong faith, could stumble and be ensnared by these thoughts, which turn all to quickly into actions. Homosexuality, like most sins, is just an inappropriate response to an unmet need. I don't see President Hinckley being soft on that sin, but I do see him trying to lead them by the hand back into the only path that will lead to true satisfaction.
Polygamy has become a different issue. More than a weakness of lust, those polygamist groups that claim to be fundamentalist Mormons have consistently blighted the name of the Church for over a century. When gays participate in their practices, they rarely claim to be led to do so by the doctrine of the Church. The polygamists not only openly disobey the commandments, but they claim divine authority to do so, and they actively seek to be seen as the truth, even the mainstream of Mormonism. It is one thing to sin personally, and it is quite another to sin and then to claim that the Church required it of you.
Thus, they become as Corianton when he went after the harlot Isabel, for when others see their conduct, they will not listen to the truth. Little wonder the Prophet feels compelled to categorically distance himself and us from polygamy.
QUOTE |
I don't see President Hinckley being soft on that sin, but I do see him trying to lead them by the hand back into the only path that will lead to true satisfaction |
I agree that it appears that the Church is less condemnatory of homosexuality.
I apologize, but I feel that any further discussion about plural marriage is completely wasted here. The LDS church changed from a persecuted church into a persecuting church, and it appears to me to be a complete waste of time to try to discuss the facts of plural marriage with those who deny it.
QUOTE |
When the Church states that there is not such a thing as Fundamentalist LDS members, it is a mistake. There are. One of their groups is called that way: Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. |
QUOTE |
Now regards to the Polygamist groups, you said "more than weakness of lust", let's not forget that our Church practised Plural Marriage with the approval of the Lord for quiet a while and the people at the time thought in the same way most people do now "a weakness of lust". |
I must disagree most strongly with your assertion that polygamy is in any way equated with homosexuality. I addressed some of it in a new message on this topic, and have provided extensive documentation and reasoning throughout that topic.
QUOTE |
polygamy is also a perversion of the doctrine, practices, culture, and history of the true Church of God |
QUOTE |
I totally disagree that is a perversion of the doctrine, culture and history of the Church where did you get that from?. |