Prior to 1978, Black Men in the Church were not allowed to hold the Priesthood or enter any type of Temple Covenants. (We have a thread within this board about it) But my question is: Why Black Women were denied access to the Temple? They were women, no Priesthood involved then why could not accessed the Temple?
I have some possible answers for this (feel free to share yours)
1. Could it be that the ban had some sort of two components, one the race and the other Temple covenants? (If you think about it, there is not a "good" reason why a Black male could not get his own endowments)
2. Could it be that certain covenants made in the Temple in the past were seen as a kind of Priesthood to women, therefore Black women were not entitled to participate? Check these quotes:
My first response is that the Temple Covenants are essentially based on married couples, man and woman. Men and women cannot be saved without the other. (1 Cor 11:11 "Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.") There are specific covenants made in relation to married relationships.
Second, if a woman is married and "shares" the priesthood jointly with her husband, then if black men were unable to hold the priesthood and subsequently ineligible to be endowed, their wives would also be ineligible.
Along that same idea, it wasn't so long ago that single women didn't receive their endowments until their wedding/sealing day. Of course, now with so many singles in the church and with sisters serving missions before marriage, the church has had to change that policy.
What about if the Black sister was indeed married but to a non-member? What would be the reason for denying her access to the Temple if the husband gave her the "ok" to enter the Temple and receive her own endowments?
Edited: LDS_forever on 11th Jan, 2007 - 12:58pm
Because, like it or not, our early brethren of the church leadership were biased - much as a lot of the population of the United States were biased/prejudiced/ignorant about African-Americans.
And of course the "Curse of Cain" doctrine.
QUOTE |
When the Nauvoo Temple openned in 1846 (the first Mormon Temple which included Higher Ordinances), black Mormons could receive Endowments, Sealings, and perform baptisms for the Dead just like all Mormons could. In 1852, President Brigham Young banned black Mormons from the Temple altogether. He said this was because, as "Canaanites" (I.e. descendants of Canaan, the sons of Ham and his Cainite wife) they were also Cainites, and under the "Curse of Cain"; which was a denial of the Priesthood. Brigham Young taught that "Negroes" (the respectful term for black Africans at that time) were the "seed" (descendants) of Cain; the firstborn son of Adam and Eve. He taught that the "Mark of Cain" was a black skin and negroid features. He taught that the "Canaanites" (as he called black Africans) could not hold the Holy Priesthood until the "other children" of Adam first had the opportunity. He said (in 1866): "And when all the rest of the children of Adam have received their blessings in the Holy Priesthood, then that curse shall be removed from the seed of Cain, and they will come up and receive all the blessings which we now are entitled to." (Journal of Discourses 11:272) |
Thank you Roz, that's what I was looking for. Really, I always thought that it was never about these women not married, or about these women married men who could not hold the Priesthood or about the Blacks and not able to hold the Priesthood, but just simple racial prejudice held by Brigham Young and the rest of leaders after him. It is CLEAR that Joseph Smith never taught such "doctrine" of the "curse" or denied the Priesthood to Black men or in this case, entrance to the Temple to Black Women.
Rather off topic, but... Then the question remains: How could this possibly happened? We are talking about Prophets here. It's a little disturbing. |
Well, it's not something I had ever researched before, and frankly my earlier post was just my first reaction/opinion to the question. It had never occurred to me before that black women were so affected by the ban on the Priesthood! I can understand lacking the Priesthood in the home, because as a single woman I experience that, but to deny temple blessings? Very hard indeed for those women, children, and families.
Rather off topic, but... Prophets of God, but men nonetheless, and NOT infallible. The website that I noted above actually discusses the fact that Joseph Smith was very vocal in his ideas about Equal Rights for Negroes - it was part of his platform when he ran for president - and that it was his position on that, perhaps more than Mormonism, that caused the angry mob to assassinate him in jail. (I also found it very interesting that the author also believes it may have been Joseph Smith's writings on this topic that inspired Abraham Lincoln's views on slavery.) |
Well, I kind of take issue. I don't agree with this statement:
QUOTE |
Because, like it or not, our early brethren of the church leadership were biased - much as a lot of the population of the United States were biased/prejudiced/ignorant about African-Americans. |
Tortdog:
QUOTE |
If you look at our history, most of our early church leaders were far more open to equal treatment of blacks than were other Christian leaders. |