![>](style_images/Executiv-909/nav_m.gif)
QUOTE (Dbackers) |
I would like to pick the brain of Alma and have a more clear explanation of why he did not stop the death and burning of the righteous when he was with Amulek, if he had the power to do so. |
QUOTE |
Evil is not a problem in this case, it is a part of the 'plan', not so? |
QUOTE |
I would have to ask, what should God do in these circumstance? Should God stop every misuse of free agency each and every time he sees it occurring, even in the terrible case of rape, murder and torture. I cannot fathom God intervening, on a regular basis, without disrupting the entire reason for mortal life. |
QUOTE |
What my main concern here is a child born into, subject to rape, and torture for years and then growing into an abuser and continuing the cycle. I cannot imagine anyone accepting this assignment: |
Well, maybe this was part of Lucifer's argument in the pre-existence to get a third to not follow the plan. I could see him saying something like if you go to the earth you will be tortured, raped, etc. Even if we could not understand what that meant fully maybe Lucifer was intelligent enough and charismatic enough to paint a good enough picture to scare the third. The ironic thing is this, we understand that they are suffering even more now! Thus we have to see if suffering isn't natural part of universal life, a necessary part. However the question comes - how is suffering chosen though? Who gets what kind of suffering and will we all eventually have to taste terrible suffering? Or is it that some can pass the test living a life without suffering.
As for what God can or cannot do I have had very heavy Discussions about that here: Source 8 if you wish to continue down that path.
I am not sure how pain and suffering is decided. Personally I think much of it is random, and based on the free agency of others. If someone does something by his free agency to hurt me then most likely I will suffer. I am not too sure if God decides that or not.
This is a really interesting topic, and one that is not easily solved. For children to suffer at the hands of their own parents, or to be abducted and suffer these horrible crimes, is a crime in itself.
It's like the question the disciples asked, when they came upon the man who was blind from birth: Who sinned? This man or his parents? The scripture says
QUOTE |
John 9:3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him. |
Isiah53
QUOTE |
The way I personally get around it is that God does not have the power to stop free agency. |
This is something I honestly wonder about when I hear about these missing children. They end up dead or on porn films, tortured and whatever else these very sick people do to them. Why doesn't Heavenly Father help them, why let them suffer for so long? Those children with the man in Austria that raped his own daughter for so many years is a perfect eample here.
In narrowing this subject down my concern may be more focused on the 'amount' and 'length' of suffering. We are limited by our concept of space and time so probably we see this period as long and laborious, maybe it is just a second of Heavenly time, but at the same time - it is more about how you feel more than what it is. In this thinking... Suffering abuse for years in the most evil manner is what I am concerned about. If a child is taken and killed well that is the end of that, they are now in a better place, but the prolonged abuse, why does the child 'get' that? Jen brought up a good example of the Austrian monster.