I always ask for scripture back up when someone makes such a huge assumption such as the one you made. Yes you said he named it and then got a lil dramatic and even said what he must be thinking we're discussing this so thats why I asked for scripture support which I think is very important when debating doctrinal stuff you know what am I saying otherwise I can state as facts my own thoughts and beliefs that not necessarily match church doctrine you know what am I saying?
Oh yeah I think we kinda are on the same page now even if we disagree.
QUOTE |
Oh yeah I think we kinda are on the same page now even if we disagree. |
QUOTE (Wes @ 5-Aug 09, 2:03 AM) |
In my opinion, we should accept His work the way He shows it to us rather than entertaining ideas of this type. There is a difference in learning about how and why the book was named that way, and considering changing His work. Big difference. |
QUOTE |
Also as a side note the book of mormon went through thousands of changes since the first translation are you saying these men changed the work of G-d? |
QUOTE |
But as expressed in this discussion there are some folks who arent sure |
QUOTE (Wes @ 5-Aug 09, 3:04 AM) |
Do you believe in the Book of Mormon? (I'm not getting that impression from you, sorry). |
QUOTE |
so why changing the name with the name of Jesus Christ on it IS an issue is beyond me. |
QUOTE |
you surely assume quickly wes |
QUOTE (Wes @ 5-Aug 09, 1:14 PM) |
Simple. All those changes you refer to, were done under His direction, by those He called to do so. |
Rather off topic, but... Are you on lds-doctrine.com? I joined sometime ago and I saw someone called wes wondering if its you. |
Message Edited... Persephone: Please use uppercase letters as appropriate: names, start of sentence, etc. See Constructive Posting Policy. |
QUOTE |
We're entertaining the idea of a new name under church direction... |
Rather off topic, but...
Not me, but I'll check it out. Thanks. |