QUOTE (Wes @ 6-Aug 09, 12:25 AM) |
Well, to me, some of the posts sound like they are worried about it. And to some extent, I think they are, otherwise they wouldn't be considering this idea. I know, . . . I know, maybe "considering" or "entertaining" is not "worrying". I understand that, so don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that they are "extremely" worried, . . . Just enough to consider the idea. |
Message Edited... Persephone: Please use uppercase letters as appropriate: names, start of sentence, etc. See Constructive Posting Policy. |
SuzieSu,
I guess we all expressed our opinion on what our thoughts are. The only thing I have gotten out of this is that we have very strong opinion and are very strongly set on them. So, as for me, I'll just leave it there because we will only be repeating ourselves over and over like we have done already. If you think it's all right, then,. . . good! I won't agree, but will respect it.
Message Edited... JB: If you have concerns about moderation take it up in your Intro Thread. Your last post was deleted because you Posted entirely in the off topic something clearly not allowed if you pay attention to our Constructive Posting Policy: Source 6 |
The Book of Mormon is actually a Book of Books - a Bible if you will, but we already have a Book with the common name "Holy Bible". When my parents were baptized in the seventies the Book of Mormon had a light blue cover and a picture of the angel Moroni on it. After that the Brethren felt a need to add the word to the front cover "Another Testament of Jesus Christ" and remove the depiction of Moroni from the front.
A few years back the Church also changed the Church's regular text to emphasize the name "Jesus Christ" in the the name of the Church. Similar to what the original author of this Thread intended the name of Jesus Christ was the focus, there is a reason for that. We should not condemn anyone for wanting to emphasize the name of Jesus Christ, to do so in my opinion is to not understand the full purpose of He to whom all glory and respect should be shown.
Additionally, whether Discussing Renaming the Book of Mormon or whatever else - I will like to refer those in this Thread to two links that will help them with the edit blocks they see in their posts:
* Constructive Posting Policy: Source 2
* The Art of Discussion: Source 3
Rather off topic, but... SuzieSu, please also check your Intro Thread |
Thanks for that JB it was not my intention to pursue this with Pres. Monson , just something to think about. Thank you for giving the explanation about how the Book of Mormon used to look, it shows that there is kind of a push to show Jesus's name more.
QUOTE (Nephi @ 16-Aug 09, 9:28 PM) |
it shows that there is kind of a push to show Jesus's name more. |
I thought you was done with the topic? Anyhow I really like Nephi's idea " "Western Testament of Christ" and then in small letters "Compiled by Mormon" or something like that you know what am I saying? The main topic with the name of the Savior.