Clinton warned Putin was behind hacking, months ago
During the final presidential debate in October, Hillary Clinton warned that 17 U.S. Intelligence agencies tracked cyber attacks to the highest levels of the Kremlin, including Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ref. Source 4o.
I'm so tired of hearing about this. They can't prove it and haven't proved it. What about the leaks that showed that the DNC basically cheated Bernie out of the nomination? I'm absolutely disgusted that Hillary got the nomination over Bernie. Please go away Hillary.
The Justice Department's internal watchdog has launched a probe of the department and the FBI's handling of investigations into Hillary Clinton's private email server, the DOJ announced Thursday.
The announcement, which was expected, comes after criticism of the department's handling of the investigation, particularly on how the public was notified. The email probe was a major issue on the 2016 campaign trail. Ref. CNN.
She is back! Hillary Clinton recently went on video with a message to the Dems and anyone that wants to save this country from falling in a pit. She looked great and ready to battle again.
International Level: Politics 101 / Political Participation: 8 0.8%
That is a interesting Question Txtrpg. I think we will be sitting in a worse situation or somewhere close to where we are now with a divided country and people on each side attacking each other over it. It is a sad state of affairs and no matter who won we were facing a divided country.
I agree with KN here, we are so divided that it makes little difference who won. We might not be in the same boat with executive orders and accusations, but we might be worse off with Russia, China, and almost definitely the Middle East. Those three countries/areas had zero respect for Clinton due to the utter failure of her tenure as SECSTATE. The reason I say we'd still be as divided is due to the extreme left and right news organizations and the internet. Those just harden people's feelings against one another.
I suspect the answer that would depend on what you would consider better or worse, along with a few things that cannot be determined yet
Hillary would have been considerably less divisive I believe. Not because she is one iota less offensive than Trump is, but because her particular excesses are much more subtle. They're easier to ignore.
Now, of course, she represents corrupt Washington business as usual, and would be bad for this country in many of the same ways as every other president for the past several decades.
Where Trump might actually turn out to be better, he is managing to screw with business as usual. I for one highly doubt that things will be better when he is done, not least because of the massive flaws in his approach. But who knows, I might be surprised. After all this situation isn't exactly rife with historical precedent.
Edited: daishain on 7th Mar, 2017 - 4:04am