FBC said:
QUOTE |
suggesting that homosexuality could be the result of a hormonal imbalance. |
QUOTE |
I have a few gay friends and I don't care what they do. |
QUOTE |
I admit it is uncomfortable to me as well, but I feel that I am being irrational and that I will get over it. |
Some quotes from the article that FarSeer referenced:
QUOTE |
Breedlove said the researchers could completely reverse male-female differences in this brain region strictly through altering blood hormonal levels in the animals by castrating the male rats and giving androgens to the females. |
QUOTE |
"Hormones are powerful. If they can change this brain region so dramatically, surely they can change other areas of the brain as well." |
I feel uneasy about the "Be homosexual but keep it secret" hidden agenda I seem to see in this thread. If you stay in the closet, your chances of meeting the right person and identifying him or her as such are rather drastically reduced, aren't they? Imagine life with the roles reversed - "OK, be straight if you want to, maybe God even wants you to, but I don't see why I have to know about it. Keep it to yourself, it's a private matter...." A lot of us would be condemned to rather lonely lives that way, I think.
I am not sure what comments made you infer that there was a hidden agenda FierceKitty. Maybe you would like to quote the comments that made you feel this way. I believe the main intention of the thread is to garner some perspectives on whether people are born gay or choose to be gay, even if the choice is unintentional. What are your thoughts on that?
Well, I think you'll have to agree that terms like "birth defect" carry a bit of a load of interpretation. You'll find it among the posts.
QUOTE (FierceKitty) |
I feel uneasy about the "Be homosexual but keep it secret" hidden agenda I seem to see in this thread. If you stay in the closet, your chances of meeting the right person and identifying him or her as such are rather drastically reduced, aren't they? |
I have finally finished reading the ten pages of previous posts and have researched the issue my self. I took the time to talk to some of my gay friends and see what they think. I took the time to ask my non-gay friends what they thought also. The result was not only varied, but very biased and divided. Most of my gay friends said they where born that way. One of them told me a story about abuse my her uncle, brother, and father and that was why she hated men and was attracted to women. The other three gave me no indication of abuse of any kind, one I grew up with and never saw abuse. He is close with his parents to this day and they accept him.
My non-gay friend however, all said that it was a choice because no guy would want to have sex that way (sorry, trying not to be too blunt.). They completely disregard the idea that it was innate and said it was completely choice. My parents believe that every gay person was either abused as a child, or seduced as a teenager. I don't believe that anyone that I talked to is completely right.
Like all issues in society, there are norms, conditioning, and exceptions the rule. This issue is no different. I believe the norm in the gay community is that they where born gay. I don't know if its genetic or if its sociological or something entirely different. But it has been happening for years, its just easier to come out now then it used to be. I believe that there are some people who are gay because of the conditions in which they grew up in. There are probably situations in which people where abuse and ended up gay because of it. Then there are the exceptions to the rule. Teen agers seduced into the fold so to speak. Teen agers are so rebellious and stubborn that they do what ever makes them feel good. therefore, I don't think that there are too many cases in which this happens. But I'm sure there are some.
Earlier in the thread, this comment was made.
QUOTE |
In a gay society there would eventually be extinction which would be contrary to normal hum evolution (and I am not talking about the ape to man theory) |
I haven't expressed a view on the subject of whether it's inborn or chosen because I'm not a genetic scientist, not a psychologist, and am far from convinced that the terms of the debate have been defined clearly. I avoid forming opinions on subjects where my data aren't reasonably solid.
What I do understand, as a language expert, is the implication of terms like "should". Let alone "wrong". Humility is the mother of all the virtues.