Arvhic,
There is a huge assumption within your reply, that I refuse to accept. Since 1967, Israel has not been occupying Palestinian territory! Israel took that territory from Jordan, Egypt, and Syria, after it was attacked by the surrounding countries! That land did NOT belong to the Palestinian Arabs. The Palestinian Arabs, IMO, should have been driven out of the territory, into Jordan (the true Palestinian Arab state). According to the UN mandate that created Israel, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank were part of Israel anyway. When Syria, Jordan, Egypt and others attacked Israel in 1967 and 1973, Israel soundly defeated them and took away their staging areas.
As for Mr. Sharon, there is a lot of dispute about his actions. He may be a war criminal. But the people who claim him to be a war criminal already show their bias against all of Israel. I am not here to defend or accuse any individuals.
I defend Israel's right to exist. I see that the people who are being elected in Palestine are dedicated to the total destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. Sharon's actions in giving up land to the Palestinians is encouraging terrorism, not reducing it.
Nighthawk,
Palestinian Arabs occupied the region in question well before the Israeli state was drawn up by the British led League of Nations. In fact the Arabs have controlled the whole region, including what is now known as Israel, for the majority of recorded history. It required mass immigration of jews to build the sort of population size Israel has today. So let's not bother with this historic debate because Palestinian Arabs have a far greater claim and affinity with that region.
Following the first Arab-Israeli War four UN-arranged armistice agreements between Israel and Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria were signed.
The small Gaza Strip was left under Egyptian control, and the West Bank was controlled by Jordan. This was signed BY Israel.
Israel (backed by the US) illegitimately attacked these regions as you mentioned in 1967. Without US backing they wouldn't have a hope. But Israel was never internationally recognised as the controlling power of these regions post-67. And as you are aware Jews make up a minority of the people who live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, despite their best efforts to populate the land with settlers.
If Israel was serious about controlling this land why are they erecting a wall and have so few people living there? This desperate bid by jewish extremists for a greater Israel is absolute nonsense. How can a race of people who have experienced the very worst ethnic cleansing in recorded history invade someone else's land through war and then try to colonise it? I will never understand this.
Nobody is denying Israel's right to exist. They have plenty of land, and prime land at that. But while you respect the right for Israel to exist, as I do, you can not ignore the right for the Palestinian people to have their own state. And it is not Jordan. The US and Israel are the only two countries in the world who have been consistently opposed to this, but even now it seems the US Administration is starting to see sense.
There is no doubt Sharon is a war criminal and he knows it. Nobody prepares a defence to war crimes if they have nothing to worry about.
My whole point is if these two communities, who are as bad as each other, can not live hand in hand, then they should both be given their own parcels of land for the sake of peace.
As for Sharon encouraging terrorism. The only terrorism he is encouraging by withdrawing settlers is from irate Jews. I am yet to work out Sharon's real motive for removing the settlers but you know that without this step there will never be peace. It is simply not an acceptable option in modern society for Israel to murder every Arab until there are none left in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
QUOTE (arvhic @ 30-Nov 05, 6:08 AM) |
Palestinian Arabs occupied the region in question well before the Israeli state was drawn up by the British led League of Nations. In fact the Arabs have controlled the whole region, including what is now known as Israel, for the majority of recorded history. It required mass immigration of jews to build the sort of population size Israel has today. So let's not bother with this historic debate because Palestinian Arabs have a far greater claim and affinity with that region. |
QUOTE |
Israel (backed by the US) illegitimately attacked these regions as you mentioned in 1967. Without US backing they wouldn't have a hope. But Israel was never internationally recognised as the controlling power of these regions post-67. And as you are aware Jews make up a minority of the people who live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, despite their best efforts to populate the land with settlers. |
It is a historical fact Arabs have been occupying and living in the region for the majority of recorded history. For several hundred years before WWI this was under the Ottoman empire. This isn't a fairytale, it is undisputable fact.
The overwhelming majority of people living in what was known as Palestine were Arabs until Israel was created and a mass immigration of Jews flocked to live there.
QUOTE |
In the late 1800s, there are lots of accounts of how Jerusalem was a small village of only a very few thousand people, with most of them Jews whose families had lived there for many generations. |
QUOTE |
Syria and Jordan had attempted to divert the Jordan River, in order to destroy Israel. On May 23, 1967, Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran, thus closing off one of Israels most vital ports. All of these things are acts of war. |
QUOTE |
All of the Palestinian leadership, the Palestinian schools, the Arab governments all claim that Israel has absolutely no right to exist, anywhere |
I feel that the average person from either Israel or Palestine really doesn't care about which country gets the Gaza Strip or the West Bank. Sure the people who live there care but I call it another case of politics and greed gone out of control, in both countries. Both countries fear that a cessation will be a sign of weakness leading only to the other country wanting more land.
Sharon in Hospital
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was taken to hospital in Jerusalem on Sunday, media reports say. Israel's Channel 10 television said Sharon, 77, apparently lost consciousness while working in his office.
Ref. CNN
UPDATE: Sharon had a stroke.
From the Palestinian Media Watch:
https://www.pmw.org.il/Latest%20bulletins%20new.htm#b191205
QUOTE |
The US House of Representatives on Friday threatened the Palestinian Authority with a loss of funding should the terrorist organization Hamas participate in the Palestinian elections in January. The House resolution called for the PA to require all groups running in the elections to disarm and recognize Israel's right to exist. The official Palestinian Authority daily cartoons ridiculed the US demand to exclude terrorists as destroying democracy and interfering in PA affairs. The following are the two cartoons: {Cartoons are shown in all their glory.} Palestinian Authority Spokesman Nabil Abu Rudayna "called on the American government not to interfere with the decisions of the [PA] parliament as it impedes the peace process and is an obstruction to achievements of peace." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, December 18, 2005] It should be noted that the various peace agreements the Palestinians have signed with Israel forbid terrorist groups such as Hamas from participating in parliamentary elections. The American concerns about an active terrorist group participating in a PA government have been rejected with derisive statements from Palestinian officials and media. This is despite the many hundreds of millions of dollars given by the EU and US to the Palestinian Authority. |
The Palestinian Authority has rejected any concerns the US had about a terrorist group participating right?
And it is not up to the US and Israel who should or should not participate in Palestine's elections. This is a double standard. You can't go around preaching democracy to the world but then telling countries you can only elect people we want you to.
All the US does by threatening to pull funding is fuel resentment in that part of the world, and consequently fan these groups popularity.
People in Palestine might not even consider Hamas to be a terrorist group anyway. Just because the US and Israel do, doesn't mean they are to Palestinians. These two countries don't have a divine right to judge who a terrorist group is to other societies.
Most Palestinians would consider the Israeli military as terrorists, and with good reason. They've certainly murdered more people in the conflict than Hamas. One man's terrorist is another man's martyr right?
If the US and Israel were serious about peace they wouldn't be threatening the Palestinian's. I don't believe this helps anyone. Surely there are more diplomatic ways to express a concern that don't involve standing over people.
I don't believe the Palestinian's want to destroy Israel. Prove it? Sure there are a minority of extremists who may want this. Just like there are right wing Jewish extremists who want to destroy Palestine. But my research indicates the overwhelming majority of Palestinians just want peace. Same with the majority of Jews.
Let's not forget that Jewish settlers have been occupying Palestinian land illegaly. And that Palestine as a nation was there long before Israel. I get the impression a lot of this rhetoric that Palestinians want to destroy Jews actually comes from Israel to justify their actions. There is always a lot of talk about it from their quarters with no proof this is the majority view.
QUOTE |
The Arab world stretches from West Northern Africa to the Pacific (Indonesia). The Muslims own 99% of that region. Within the Middle East, Arabs own 90% of the region. Little, tiny Israel owns less than 10% of the Middle East. Yet it has by far the most robust, progressive economy, the most liberty, the most religious liberty, and the most impressive range of civil rights of any country in the entire region. |