Israel Considers Options After Bombing
QUOTE |
Israel's leaders held the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority responsible for the deadliest suicide bombing in 20 months but stopped short Tuesday of branding it an "enemy entity" or ordering a large-scale military operation. Olmert and senior advisers and security chiefs met for two hours Tuesday to weigh a response. The group decided to hold Hamas responsible because it did not denounce the bombing - a sharp departure from the previous Palestinian leadership's immediate condemnations of such attacks. |
I think people are still being mislead by the media, believing that Palestine is doing all terrorist activities and Israel is completely right. This leads people to believe that when Israel strikes Hamas it is just getting the "bad guys". But Israel rarely protects any non-israeli person in these attacks and often ends up killing civilians, often purposefully to make a point. But the media gives palestinians clever titles like militants and resistors when infact the so called "terrorist attack" is on Palestinian lands against the israeli army that is illegally occupying their land. Remember, Israel gave them that land as their own, you can't then occupy and take back the land.
The difference is that the last attack that I know of (and almost all others) from Israel, was directed at military targets - known terrorist leaders. When the Palestinians attack - every time that I know of - it is against innocent civilians.
As long as Hamas agrees with these terrorist (yes, terrorist) attacks against civilians, they will continue to gain hatred and censure from the US and other countries.
There is a HUGE difference between what Israel does and what the Palestinians do. And to judge otherwise is, in my opinion, to become an apologist for the terrorists.
QUOTE |
Do you really want us to answer this question, arvhic? |
QUOTE |
Israel vs Palestine - The breakdown This is a very interesting website that compares death rates, prisoner rates, aid rates, unemployment rates and other statistics in this conflict since 2000. It uses official sources from both sides. 1,084 Israelis and 3,863 Palestinians have been killed since September 29, 2000. 633 Israelis and 29,731 Palestinians have been injured since September 29, 2000. The U.S. gives $15,139,178 per day to the Israeli government and military and $232,290 per day to Palestinian NGO's. Israel has been targeted by at least 65 UN resolutions and the Palestinians have been targeted by none. |
QUOTE |
His response, which I agree with, was for the Palestinian people to stand up and reject what Hamas is doing, or allowing to happen. I understand that Hamas has done good things for the people of Palestine, but using terrorist tactics against Israel, can only bring despair to Palestine, and Hamas should be watching out for their people. |
QUOTE |
The difference is that the last attack that I know of (and almost all others) from Israel, was directed at military targets - known terrorist leaders. When the Palestinians attack - every time that I know of - it is against innocent civilians. |
QUOTE |
As long as Hamas agrees with these terrorist (yes, terrorist) attacks against civilians, they will continue to gain hatred and censure from the US and other countries. |
QUOTE |
Why should Palestinians suffer because of the bloody mindedness of their elected representatives and their neighbours? |
I understand what you are saying and respect your point of view Malexander, but what were the alternatives in Palestine?
I think you need to understand the reasons why the Palestinians voted for Hamas before making them suffer for the actions of their Government.
I have posted a link to a report earlier that unlocks that mystery.
You have one of the poorest countries in the world who voted for a group that, a) provided charity and social welfare; was perceived as forcing Israel to pull out settlements through hard-line means, and c) was not corrupt and perceived to be transparent.
You have to remember that in elections one party has to win. The only other choice was Fatah, a party that did nothing for its people, was perceived as puppets to Israel and the US, and was visibly corrupt.
Not everyone in Palestine voted for Hamas, not everyone even voted. But they received more votes than the only other viable alternative. And to say they made the wrong choice is your opinion. Until you have lived in that situation and grown up with those alternatives I don't think it is fair of us to judge that they made the wrong choice based on our bias.
Now why should the people suffer for that?
Do we punish poor people in Africa, South America and Asia because they vote for regimes we don't like? Even if these countries want to support Palestinians through NGOs that is at least something. But to try and starve them out of existence is downright cruel.
Do we punish Americans because their government invades other countries without any reason and creates a mess they cannot clean up? Of course not, because most Americans are great people and you can't blame them for their government.
I agree that Hamas is now a government and must behave as such, but they haven't claimed responsibility for this terrorist act. Why do you think they have? Their stupid rhetoric in condoning the act will come back to bite them, and if it does, too bad.
But my concern isn't for Hamas, it's for the 70% of Palestinians who live below the poverty line and are being made to pay for the actions of a minority of idiots.
On another note, the UN Security Council has consistently tried to reprimand Israel for its actions but guess which permanent member blocks their resolutions every single time! I"ll give you a tip, it ain't Russia, China, France or the UK.
Thanks arvhic for your contributions to this discussion. I really do appreciate it. My fear is that if countries do decide to fund Palestine, that the money still won't get to the people. How do we not know that Hamas will take this money and use it to fund terrorist activity? I completely agree with you that the people are the ones that are suffering, but Hamas needs to understand why, and if they really care about their people, either step down, or change their ways. Funding them, is not, in my opinion, the solution.
I agree with you on that point. That is always the danger of providing aid to any unreliable regime. But from the reports I have read, Hamas appears to spend a lot of money on social welfare. It was one of the main platforms that parachuted them to power. When I have time I will try to find some figures on exactly what Hamas spends and where. Of course this will never be an easy task.
I think we also have to be careful to separate the rhetoric of Hamas from it's funding of terrorist activities. We simply do not know if Hamas is still actively involved in terrorist activities, there needs to be some evidence of this. Nighthawk, can you dig some up mate?
We know that the last terrorist act was conducted by Islamic Jihad, which has no obvious link to Hamas. Regardless of their bloody ways in the past, Hamas has actually kept to the latest cease-fire. But if they are found to be involved in terrorist activities then the funding should not dry up, it should go to NGOs in Palestine to help the poor.
Edited: arvhic on 20th Apr, 2006 - 1:29am