Politics - The Next US President? - Page 21 of 25

Kerry made a major faux pas this weekend... - Page 21 - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 12th Oct, 2004 - 2:21am

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

+  « First of 25 pgs.  17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 
Posts: 200 - Views: 10492
 
?
Poll: Are you happy that Pres. Bush was re-elected for another term?
1
  Yes       25.00%
3
  No       75.00%
Total Votes: 4
  
Closed
Post Date: 3rd Oct, 2004 - 1:34pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Politics - The Next US President? - Page 21

2 GO BACK AND FORTH ON ISSUES DOMESTIC

President Bush lashed out at Sen. John Kerry on Saturday for his stands on domestic programs ranging from retirement to health care, saying the Democrat is obstructing needed reforms that would give workers more control over their financial future.
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...95709%2C00.html

Sponsored Links:
5th Oct, 2004 - 10:51pm / Post ID: #

President US The Politics

QUOTE (JB@Trinidad @ 1-Oct 04, 8:04 AM)
So what is the verdict? Who did better in the debate? Personally I think Bush made the mistake of repeating himself too much. Kerry's big mistake is not really saying how his 'better' plan is specifically different from Bush's current strategy.

In my opinion, the debate was a push. Kerry made open-ended, public appeasing promises, and Bush was a bit too angry and defensive in his retorts. However, I wanted Bush to be emotional, because his decisions were very hard to make, and there had to be a degree of emotion involved with it. I would rather have a president who can show emotion than a stone cold person, who cannot even flinch when asked about his differing opinions over the years. That type of 'steeliness' quite frankly scares me.


International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 ActivistPoliticianEnvoy 24.1%


Post Date: 6th Oct, 2004 - 11:25pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Politics - The Next US President? History & Civil Business Politics

TOE-TO-TOE ON IRAQ WAR

In a sharp face-to-face exchange in the opening parry of the vice presidential debate, Sen. John Edwards accused Vice President Dick Cheney of "not being straight with the American people" about Iraq, prompting Cheney to vigorously defend the administration's record on foreign policy and to challenge the national security credentials of the Democratic ticket.
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...96447%2C00.html

7th Oct, 2004 - 1:03am / Post ID: #

Page 21 President US The Politics

So how did everyone think the one and only Vice Presidential debate went? Personally, I believe Cheney had the edge in that he used facts and years of experience to prove that Edwards is not ready for the Vice Presidential role. It was clear that Edwards is heavily relying on Kerry to carry him through the campaign while Cheney can stand on his own. It is also clear that Edwards has motives on his own for running with Kerry; ie, he is looking towards a Presidential bid at a later stage, while Cheney made it clear this is as far as his political career goes. I found it quite amusing when Edwards was asked how he could defend an economic policy of Kerry's that he stated during the primaries would make the deficit worse instead of better.


International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 ActivistPoliticianEnvoy 24.1%


7th Oct, 2004 - 2:44am / Post ID: #

President US The Politics

I was quite pleased with the VP debate. One commentator said afterwards that Edwards was like a "liitle yapping dog" next to Cheney, who was composed and en pointe.

Two events that stuck with me were, first, when the host asked Edwards what his qualifications are for being VP. He went completely off topic and never actually answered the question. Cheney directly pointed that out to the host, who made no comment. And second, when Edwards had the gall to go on about Cheney's "gay" daughter! That is absolutely the most tactless, classless thing I've ever seen a politician do in public.

IMO
Roz


International Level: Ambassador / Political Participation: 595 ActivistPoliticianAmbassador 59.5%


Post Date: 8th Oct, 2004 - 5:40pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Politics - The Next US President?

Tonight is supposed to be a town meeting. This means that people can ask questions on any subject, and the candidates will have to react on the fly. Domestic issues, foreign policy questions, everything is on the table for this one. ABC News anchor Charles Gibson is the moderator for tonight. He'll choose the questions, which will have been submitted in advance. So Charlie will be the only one who will know what the subjects will be. Now once the questioner has actually asked his or her question out loud, and it has to be the same one they submitted, their microphones will be cut immediately. No follow-up, no dialogue with the candidates.

Now the stakes, and the spin, have certainly changed since the last one. Before the first debate, both sides were trying to lower expectations about their man, praising the debating skills of their opponent. But the polls were unanimous in saying that the viewers felt that Sen. Kerry had won that debate. So there is more pressure on the President. And the polls also show the race is tightening up to a virtual dead heat. So clearly these debates are having an effect.
Ref. Leroy Sievers and the Nightline Staff
Nightline Offices ABCNEWS Washington D.C.

Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for FREE to JB's Youtube Channel!
12th Oct, 2004 - 1:39am / Post ID: #

Politics The US President - Page 21

With the recent Afghan elections having gone well, and now blessed by the UN (see here) what are your opinions on how this will affect President Bush' re-election bid. This has been one of his campaign issues in getting a fair and balanced election process in once terror striken countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. Will it provide favorable public opinion or not?


International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 ActivistPoliticianEnvoy 24.1%


12th Oct, 2004 - 2:21am / Post ID: #

Politics The US President Politics Business Civil & History - Page 21

Kerry made a major faux pas this weekend... Here is commentary on the original article from the New York Times Magazine (the Times requires registration, so this is an alternate source).

''We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives but they're a nuisance,'' Kerry told the New York Times Magazine on Sunday.

Kerry compared the activities of groups like al-Qaida and Hamas to the kind of petty street crime he fought earlier in his career.

''As a former law enforcement person, I know we're never going to end prostitution. We're never going to end illegal gambling," he told the Times.

"But we're going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your life.''

The top Democrat's words are sure to fuel the impression that he's unwilling to wage an all-out war against the terrorist threat but instead take a more European view that a certain amount of terrorism is acceptable.

https://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/11/84148.shtml


International Level: Ambassador / Political Participation: 595 ActivistPoliticianAmbassador 59.5%


+  « First of 25 pgs.  17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 

 
> TOPIC: Politics - The Next US President?
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,