China vs USA - Page 14 of 39

US defends weapons sale to Taiwan The US defends - Page 14 - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 31st Jan, 2010 - 10:56am

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

+  « First of 39 pgs.  10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  ...Latest (39) »
Posts: 309 - Views: 87905
USA versus China versus Chinese versus Americans The role of its Army, Politics, and Status in the World.
China vs USA Related Information to China vs USA
27th Mar, 2009 - 2:46pm / Post ID: #

China vs USA - Page 14

You made me smile with your response this morning farseer. I agree it is looking like some underling politics are at play here. Perhaps to try and bring the UN in to play in keeping China in line. Do we really want them playing in nukes?


International Level: Senior Politician / Political Participation: 188 ActivistPoliticianSenior Politician 18.8%


Sponsored Links:
28th Mar, 2009 - 2:50pm / Post ID: #

USA China

I doubt any source in the world can keep China "in line." I think China will do as it pleases, and the world can do nothing but watch. I also think that China, sooner or later, will get tired of playing the game and will want to exert itself as a world-class power, and there will be no stopping them. If it comes to war, it will be long, bloody, and merciless. All this fiddling around in the Middle East will be like child's play in comparison. The U.S. Would do well to step cautiously, in my opinion.


International Level: Ambassador / Political Participation: 595 ActivistPoliticianAmbassador 59.5%


Post Date: 28th Mar, 2009 - 3:07pm / Post ID: #

China vs USA
A Friend

China vs USA History & Civil Business Politics

I have to agree with you FarSeer. China does what it wants when it wants too. I think they respect the US and the power that we hold but I doubt that will stop them if they want to do something. Playing around with nukes is not something I am surprised with.

30th Mar, 2009 - 8:12pm / Post ID: #

Page 14 USA China

Given their mind set and manpower China is a very powerful country. Military toys can be assembled fast enough I am sure. I think political strategies will be required and proper recognition would be wise for long term peace. The world stag is being set and the outcome will be interesting even if dangerous.


International Level: Senior Politician / Political Participation: 188 ActivistPoliticianSenior Politician 18.8%


Post Date: 23rd Jun, 2009 - 6:27pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

USA China

China and US hold military talks

Defence officials from the United States and China are meeting in Beijing for two days of high-level talks. Ref. Source 9

Post Date: 17th Nov, 2009 - 4:40pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

China vs USA

China and US 'to work together'

The presidents of China and the US agree to tackle some of the world's most pressing problems, after talks in Beijing. Ref. Source 8

Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for FREE to JB's Youtube Channel!
Post Date: 21st Nov, 2009 - 1:33pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

China USA - Page 14

Ambassador Jon Huntsman Jr. Blasts media over Obama's China trip

BEIJING - Washington's ambassador to Beijing hit out Friday at negative U.S. Media coverage of President Barack Obama's visit to China, saying it failed to take into account important progress on many issues. Although producing no breakthroughs on key issues, Obama's first state visit to the Asian giant that ended Wednesday was heralded by both sides as a success. Ref. Source 7

Post Date: 31st Jan, 2010 - 10:56am / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

China USA Politics Business Civil & History - Page 14

US defends weapons sale to Taiwan

The US defends a proposed $6.4bn weapons sale to Taiwan after China angrily announced a series of retaliatory moves. Ref. Source 6


 
> TOPIC: China vs USA
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,