USA vs Iran - Page 19 of 95

Iran just keeps drawing attention to themselves. - Page 19 - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 24th Apr, 2006 - 12:46am

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

+  « First of 95 pgs.  15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23  ...Latest (95) »
Posts: 758 - Views: 85418
 
?
Poll: Will the USA vs. Iran issue end up in full scale war?
16
  Yes, very soon       48.48%
14
  Maybe, but not anytime soon       42.42%
3
  No, it is all talk       9.09%
Total Votes: 33
Guests Cannot Vote - Join To Add Your Vote! 
USA versus Iran
U.S.A. versus Will Iran end up like Iraq?
USA vs Iran Related Information to USA vs Iran
13th Apr, 2006 - 2:32pm / Post ID: #

USA vs Iran - Page 19

Konquerez, you are the type of voter that has all the power. The swinging voter who thinks with his head and not with his heart.

And obviously on Iran you are applying the same objective binoculars. Well I applaud you for that mate.

You wont be wrong on Iran. You can never be wrong for promoting peace. And I don't say that to disturb the right. I say that because I know for a fact diplomacy is the only way forward in the Middle East despite the fact we all speak diferent languages. We must learn to communicate and accept. We cannot force democracy or any other political persuasion or anyone.

I don't honestly believe Bush or his lunatic mates would dare bomb Iran. If he did then I can promise you thousands of US troops will be burnt. He's not that stupid, nor are his hawkish friends. I am actually interested to know what Halliburton's, ooops sorry, I mean Cheney's, thoughts on Iran are.?

Reconcile Edited: arvhic on 13th Apr, 2006 - 2:33pm


International Level: Negotiator / Political Participation: 453 ActivistPoliticianNegotiator 45.3%


Sponsored Links:
Post Date: 14th Apr, 2006 - 12:52pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Iran USA

ANOTHER GENERAL JOINS RANKS OPPOSING RUMSFELD

The commander who led the elite 82nd Airborne Division during its mission in Iraq has joined the chorus of retired generals calling on Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to leave the Pentagon.
Ref. https://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/13/ira...feld/index.html

FIGHTING DISPLACES TENS OF THOUSANDS OF IRAQIS

The number of Iraqis fleeing their homes for safer parts of the country has more than doubled in two weeks to 65,000, the Iraqi Ministry of Displacement and Migration said Thursday.
Ref. https://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/04/13/...main/index.html

Post Date: 16th Apr, 2006 - 5:18pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

USA vs Iran History & Civil Business Politics

PM CALLS IRAN'S PRESIDENT IRRESPONSIBLE FOR ANTI-ISRAEL COMMENTS

Prime Minister Stephen Harper says the Iranian president was irresponsible and outrageous when he said Israel was headed for annihilation.
Ref. https://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/200...rael060415.html



PERES: 'AHMADINEJAD REPRESENTS SATAN'

Former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres responded to veiled threats made by
Iran's president against Israel, saying Mahmoud Ahmadinejad "will end up in
the same way as [Saddam] Hussein."

Ref. https://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/04/15/...iran/index.html

17th Apr, 2006 - 3:04am / Post ID: #

Page 19 Iran USA

Iranian group signing up potential martyrs

QUOTE
Some 200 Iranians have volunteered in the past few days to carry out "martyrdom missions" against U.S. and British interests around the world if Iran is attacked, a hard-line group said Sunday.


https://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/04/16/...reut/index.html

You see, this is what I don't understand about the Middle eastern countries. When they begin to feel threatened this is the way they respond; by recruiting volunteers for 'martyrdom missions'? How can the US and other countries not interpret this as planning terrorist activity? Most normal countries would use diplomacy or start bulking up their military, but not these people. Then the US is supposed to show tact when dealing with them.


International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 ActivistPoliticianEnvoy 24.1%


17th Apr, 2006 - 3:13am / Post ID: #

Iran USA

The answer to that is very simple, they know they are no match for a USA / UK assault, despite all their vain babblings, so what better tactic than for them to instill fear in the general public so as to get the citizens of these countries to not attack - it is all psychological warfare - which always comes before the physical warfare.


International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3231 ActivistPoliticianInternational Guru 100%


21st Apr, 2006 - 6:53pm / Post ID: #

USA vs Iran

Here is a very nice editorial dealing with Iran's actions and aspirations.

https://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/fe...ml?id=110008266

(You may have to register to read it. Registration is free.)

Besides the fact that Iran has a strong history of lying and reneging on any and all diplomatic agreements, I am concerned about the rabidly anti-semitic rantings of the President, as well as the paranoid, oppressive activities of the mullahs. Are they really as unhinged as they appear? Or is it all posturing to make the world afraid?

Iran is the home of the ancient civilization of Persia. At one time, it was a magnificent home to art, culture, and beauty. Now, and for the last several centuries, it is the home of paranoia, hatred, and ugliness.

Of course, only 20% of the people in Iran support their government. But that government is strong enough to keep the people down, develop nuclear weapons, and then use them.

From their recent rantings, along with their support for terrorist insurgents in Iraq, it certainly seems to me that they would be willing to supply nuclear weapons to various terrorist groups. Where would such weapons be used? How about New York, Washington, D.C., Tel Aviv, Los Angeles, or London? Does anyone really doubt that the nutc... er, men, who run Iran would even hesitate to do this?


International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 854 ActivistPoliticianInternational Guru 85.4%


Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for FREE to JB's Youtube Channel!
22nd Apr, 2006 - 1:19am / Post ID: #

USA Iran - Page 19

I'm not worried about Iran's nuclear aspirations because they simply cannot develop weapons anytime soon. And there is just no evidence they are pursuing any, it's all speculation.

I think the world should not jump the gun here like what happened with Iraq. We don't know if Iran is seeking nuclear weapons and they should be allowed to pursue a civilian nuclear program.

I think the rantings of their president is all posturing. Israel's military would crush Tehran in a matter of hours. I don't think Iran would be suicidal enough to attack Israel. Who else matters in the Middle East, right?

All this talk about Iran trying to get weapons is scaremongering in my opinion. The Iranians don't need to sponsor insurgents because they have a lot of influence over Iraq's Shiite dominated clerical government. Yes, Iraq is heading towards becoming another democracy failure in some eyes!

Iran's government is just another case of a clerical regime the West doesn't like. Iran should be dealt with through the UN.

QUOTE
From their recent rantings, along with their support for terrorist insurgents in Iraq, it certainly seems to me that they would be willing to supply nuclear weapons to various terrorist groups.


I don't remember any Iranian making such statements. This is all paranoida. Why would the bad guys want to waste millions of dollars bombing people they have no beef with?

Does anyone here honestly believe Iran is in need of intervention any more than half of Africa? If so why?

I find it amazing that tyrants in Africa always escape the radar despite massacring millions of people, while Iran, who hasn't done anything yet, is being talked about as in the axis of evil. I wonder if Iran would still be in this axis of evil if their major export was goat's milk, and not oil?

Reconcile Edited: arvhic on 22nd Apr, 2006 - 1:26am


International Level: Negotiator / Political Participation: 453 ActivistPoliticianNegotiator 45.3%


24th Apr, 2006 - 12:46am / Post ID: #

USA Iran Politics Business Civil & History - Page 19

Iran just keeps drawing attention to themselves. I believe what arvhic said about them posturing with their words and now actions. Here is an example of such posturing

Ahmadinejad recruits Hezbollah terror chief
'When the Iranians decide to hit the West in its soft belly, Imad will be the 1 to act'

QUOTE
When Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad traveled to Damascus in January, he took a special guest with him on the flight from Tehran - one of the world's most wanted terrorists

Intelligence experts have told the London Times Ahmadinejad has recruited Imad Mugniyah, the Lebanese commander of Hezbollah's overseas operations, to oversee retaliation against Western targets if the U.S. orders a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.


https://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=49866

What should the US' and world's reaction be to this? What reaction is Iran looking for?


International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 ActivistPoliticianEnvoy 24.1%



 
> TOPIC: USA vs Iran
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,