Politics - USA the big bad bully? - Page 4 of 5

QUOTE I don't know one person who - Page 4 - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 31st Oct, 2005 - 10:41pm

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

+  1 2 3 4 5 
Posts: 39 - Views: 3536
Post Date: 24th Sep, 2005 - 11:42pm / Post ID: #

Politics -  USA the big bad bully?
A Friend

Politics - USA the big bad bully? - Page 4

I hate to be so single-minded on this but before Bush things were quiter. People like to judge others based on their negative actions. Because of Bush's wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, people started hated America. Which personally is a stupid thing to do. Are we all going to hate the Zimbabweans because of Mugabe? Are we going to hate the white South Africans because of Voerwoerd? Are we going to hate the Soviets just because of Stalin?

One double standard I really despise is the fact that America wants to control the world but knows nothing about it! It's a fact that American students(I am in the minority) knows very little about the world's geography. Most Americans can't even find their 50 states on a map, not to mention their capitols, their territories and the countries. And then America comes with it's big bad ideas, cut financional aid for countries which it doesn't support, propagate American culture to the "backward world" which I don't deny that America has great movies, songs and great authors, but what would the world be if everyone drank Coke, wore Levi's Jeans,yapped on cellphones and followed Gordon Gekko's greed is good philosophy? Also, why not attack a few countries so people can see how great America is. Hmm.... question is which countries. Bush would say...hmmm...Libya, Qaddafi is a bad man, hmmm.... North Korea, nukes, No, what am I thinking? Oil and my family's wealth and honor can be uplifted if I attack Iraq. Yeah, I came full circle back to Bush.

Sponsored Links:
25th Sep, 2005 - 2:10am / Post ID: #

bully bad big USA Politics

Yellowknife said:

QUOTE
I hate to be so single-minded on this but before Bush things were quiter. People like to judge others based on their negative actions. Because of Bush's wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, people started hated America.
"People" started hating America long before Bush came along, and way before Iraq and Afghanistan.

QUOTE
One double standard I really despise is the fact that America wants to control the world...

That's rather a bold statement, and one I disagree with.

Offtopic but,
QUOTE
...control the world but knows nothing about it! It's a fact that American students(I am in the minority) knows very little about the world's geography. Most Americans can't even find their 50 states on a map, not to mention their capitols, their territories and the countries.

That's probably mostly true, and I have to admit that I'm in that category. I can identify regions and areas, but I have difficulty pinpointing any countries other than the largest ones. But that has nothing to do with the American FedGov's aspirations in the world arena, in my opinion.


International Level: Ambassador / Political Participation: 595 ActivistPoliticianAmbassador 59.5%


20th Oct, 2005 - 4:07pm / Post ID: #

Politics - USA the big bad bully? History & Civil Business Politics

Just a little tiny bit of fun here.

It seems that a judge in Spain wants three US military members to appear in his court, because they fired upon a hotel in Baghdad a couple of years ago, killing a Spanish journalist.
https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051019/ap_on_...GZhBHNlYwM3MjE-

QUOTE
Pedraz had sent two requests to the United States - in April 2004 and June 2005 - to have statements taken from the suspects or to obtain permission for a Spanish delegation to quiz them. Both went unanswered.

He said he issued the arrest order because of a lack of judicial cooperation from the United States regarding the case.

The warrant "is the only effective measure to ensure the presence of the suspects in the case being handled by Spanish justice, given the lack of judicial cooperation by U.S. authorities," the judge said in the warrant.

.....

U.S. officials have insisted that the soldiers believed they were being shot at when they opened fire.

Following the Palestine incident, then-Secretary of State    Colin Powell said a review of the incident found that the use of force was justified.

In late 2003, the National Court, acting on a request from Couso's family, agreed to consider filing criminal charges against three members of the tank crew.

Fort Stewart spokeswoman Jennifer Scales said the three no longer are assigned to Fort Stewart or the 3rd Infantry Division.

De Camp, who is now an adjunct mathematics professor at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Va., said three investigations into the incident - two military investigations and one by the Committee to Protect Journalists - had exonerated all three men.


Ah, now we see why it is so important that there be an International Criminal Court. When someone accidentally gets killed because they are in a war zone, it is vital that the warriors involved be hounded, harassed, and harangued until they are thrown into a stinking Spanish prison for life.

That's what it is all about, folks. Throw the warriors in prison, but turn a blind eye to the enablers of terror in your own midst (the Muslim imams in Spain who promote jihad such as the 3/11 bombings). Especially if the warriors are Americans. After all, as the title of this topic says, the USA is the "big bad bully."

BTW, has anyone noticed anything from the ICC about bringing up bin Laden or any other leaders of Al Qaeda on charges for Europeans killed on 9/11?

I didn't think so.


International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 854 ActivistPoliticianInternational Guru 85.4%


Post Date: 21st Oct, 2005 - 3:58am / Post ID: #

Politics -  USA the big bad bully?
A Friend

Page 4 bully bad big USA Politics

There is a disturbing trend that is taking place in this thread, justifying what the U.S. does with examples of other countries wrong doing. There is no doubt that other countries to wrong things allot, but thats no excuse for our wrongs in the world.

I am a patriot. I am not U.S. bashing by what I am saying. I vote every chance I get and support our troops over sea's and at home. I pay taxes out the wazoo for everything. This gives me the right to say how I feel without someone calling me a U.S. basher.

The United States is a bully. We go where we please, when we please, doing what we please. When everyone else says don't, we ignore it and do what ever we want. We force our form of government and American ideals on people whether they want it or not through our policies and attitude towards the rest of the world. As information comes out that makes the war in Iraq more for our own purposes than actual need, it becomes more apparent that we do what we want for any little reason we can come up with.

The U.S. gives foreign ambassadors protection to encourage them to come here with open lines of communication. It was given by us, it didn't have to be that way, but we did. To tell other countries that if they don't have the same laws regarding our people in their with threat of penalties and sanctions is absolutely a bully tactic! Do what we say or else! Since when is it required that other countries follow our lead and have the same policies as us? Thats not a fair requirement of another sovereign nation. You cant convince me that isn't a bully tactic by the bigger country.

Further, I am really tired of the idea that every thing the U.S. does is right in the eyes of its citizens and the idealogy that those who think the U.S. is doing wrong is bad and not a patriot or a U.S. basher. That is the same bully mentality our government has and is completely fallacious in my opinion.

21st Oct, 2005 - 7:19pm / Post ID: #

bully bad big USA Politics

QUOTE
The United States is a bully. We go where we please, when we please, doing what we please. When everyone else says don't, we ignore it and do what ever we want. We force our form of government and American ideals on people whether they want it or not through our policies and attitude towards the rest of the world. As information comes out that makes the war in Iraq more for our own purposes than actual need, it becomes more apparent that we do what we want for any little reason we can come up with.


I have no problem with this. I believe we have a right to do what we want without getting permission from others. I, personally, have no problem with our having gone into Iraq. I believe, we had a failure of intelligence, which is unfortunate. However, based upon what we believed to be true at that time, I think we had to go in. In addition, frankly, I think we have a responsibility to other humans to intervene in certain situations. Since going into Iraq, we have become aware of just how truly awful they were treated. Mass killings. How is this different than what Hitler did? Should he have been allowed to do what he was doing with no intervention because they German people supported him? I don't think so.

QUOTE
The U.S. gives foreign ambassadors protection to encourage them to come here with open lines of communication. It was given by us, it didn't have to be that way, but we did. To tell other countries that if they don't have the same laws regarding our people in their with threat of penalties and sanctions is absolutely a bully tactic! Do what we say or else! Since when is it required that other countries follow our lead and have the same policies as us? Thats not a fair requirement of another sovereign nation. You cant convince me that isn't a bully tactic by the bigger country.


I think you are quite misguided here too. We have every right to say that we are not going to subject our diplomats to the risks they would be subjected too if it weren't for such protections. This is not carte blanche to do what they want, but it does mean they are held to US laws not some Muslim law for example that says stone the woman for committing adultery. If they don't want to grant our diplomats that immunity, it is their right. However, it is just as much our right not to send our diplomats in such cases. I fully support the decision not to submit our diplomats or military members to such risks.

Power and bully are not the same thing. Whether or not we are bullies, I do not know or care, but we certainly have the power. Take the good with the bad. You want my money, deal with my requirements. Just like when my parents used to say "you live under my roof, you follow my rules."


International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 ActivistPoliticianDiplomat 32%


23rd Oct, 2005 - 10:06pm / Post ID: #

Politics - USA the big bad bully?

There sounds to be a lot of wrongs and rights within this thread. Some of the facts listed are quite debateable, yet others do not seem harsh enough. America, being a or the superpower will always be hated. That happens on every scale, in every environment. Those without hate those with - it is as simple as that. Yet when we talk of wars, I personally thought Afghanistan was an answer to a terrible attack and also helped a country where nearly all the people were subjected to pretty tough control; Iraq, well if nearly all of the countries in the world say leave'm alone, especially those within range of any threat, then that is exactly what we should have done.

I have stated in other threads that I have personally been to many countries that the U.S. has helped and is helping without any return of goods such as oil or such. To paint us as the big evil, when some of us remember times of suppression of other nations that now stand liberated with democratic societies by the aid of our soldiers and fallen soldiers/ and our pushy-ness to ensure all peoples are treaty with humanity, is a disappointment.

As all should be in their homeland, I am proud to be an American.


International Level: New Activist / Political Participation: 14 ActivistPoliticianNew Activist 1.4%


Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for FREE to JB's Youtube Channel!
31st Oct, 2005 - 1:12pm / Post ID: #

Politics USA big bad bully - Page 4

The US is seen as a bully because people don't like other countries interfering with their affairs. And it tends to leave countries in a similar or worse mess than when they arrived. Of course the same can be said for many other superpowers in history.

For example, Afghanistan is now controlled by war lord thugs just as vicious as the Taliban. The reality is the US-led invasion has not helped the people. There are still very few rights for women, especially those living outside of Kabul. People are being murdered every day.

All the war in Afghanistan has achieved is to install a puppet, powerless and token "democratic" government, and to revive the heroin trade. I actually thought the Taliban were very good at containing the supply, they are certainly better than the warlords.

Iraq is another example. It was not a situation that needed intervening. In fact far more innocent civilians have died since the war than had been murdered by Saddam in the years leading up to it. Saddam was powerless, the world was intentionally lied to, and now Iraq is a disaster. Sure, the US government planned the invasion many years ago, but other governments including my own foolishly followed for other political reasons. You can't just blame the US Government for this.

I agree that superpowers will be more scrutinised than most nations but this is not out of jealously. The American government has to stop thinking it's way of living is the best or what the rest of the world aspires to. This is so far from the truth it is not funny. I don't know one person who wants to live in America or wants the American way of life. Invading countries for ideological reasons is not only stupid, but will cause tension with other cultures. Of course the US will look like a bully when it tries to force its beliefs on others.

QUOTE
I have no problem with this. I believe we have a right to do what we want without getting permission from others.


This is the problem. The US DOESN'T have the right to interfere in other people's affairs. How would Americans like it if when China becomes a superpower it starts pushing for regime change in the US?

But one thing has to be made clear. I think it is ridiculous to hate or blame American people for what their government does. It is obvious the media in the US is very weak, so you can't blame the people for supporting their government in conflict.


International Level: Negotiator / Political Participation: 453 ActivistPoliticianNegotiator 45.3%


31st Oct, 2005 - 10:41pm / Post ID: #

Politics USA big bad bully Politics Business Civil & History - Page 4

QUOTE
I don't know one person who wants to live in America or wants the American way of life.


Really?! We have such a huge problem with illegal immigration in this country that it is obvious many do want to live in this country and they do want this way of life.

QUOTE
This is the problem. The US DOESN'T have the right to interfere in other people's affairs.


I think the problem is that we don't always agree upon what is our business.


International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 ActivistPoliticianDiplomat 32%


+  1 2 3 4 5 

 
> TOPIC: Politics - USA the big bad bully?
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,